DESIGN OF CULTURAL HERITAGE TRAILS BASED ON URBAN CATALYST THEORY: STRATEGIES AND APPROACHES
Keywords:
heritage trail, urban catalyst, environmental design, streetscape design, cultural heritage, urban design, materials, colors, urban environment, design objects, street space, spatial perception, public space, tourism.Abstract
Abstract. Purpose. This paper addresses issues such as unclear spatial organization and insufficient integration with surrounding functions in the design of urban heritage trails. The main objective is to investigate the implementation of the widely applied urban catalyst theory in the practice of planning and design of cultural heritage trails, which will provide new perspectives and methods for theoretical research on the design of urban cultural heritage trails. Methodology. Through a comprehensive literature review, this study analyzes the developmental trends of heritage trails and the principles of urban catalyst theory. It employs case studies to identify the environmental design characteristics and critical factors influencing the effectiveness of heritage trails through the lens of catalyst theory. Results. The findings suggest that the design challenges faced by urban heritage trails can be effectively mitigated by adopting a spatial organization strategy that transitions from point-like elements to broader areas. The study delineates three key design steps: activating spatial nodes, ensuring continuity in spatial interfaces, and extending the urban context, supported by thorough case analyses. Scientific novelty. This research distinguishes itself by applying urban catalyst theory to address specific design issues within heritage trails, effectively summarizing and articulating relevant methods for practitioners in the field. Practical significance. The insights derived from this study provide a theoretical foundation and clear guidelines for the planning and design of future urban heritage trails, ensuring they are better integrated with their urban contexts and enhance cultural experiences for visitors.
References
Attoe W., Logan D. American urban architecture: catalysts in the design of cities. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989. 190 p.
Beck D., Brooks S. Social enterprise and the development of cultural heritage assets as catalysts for urban placemaking. New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. 2019. Vol. 101, P. 309–315. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92102-0_33.
Boyd S. W. Editorial: heritage trails and tourism. Journal of Heritage Tourism. 2017. Vol. 12. Iss. 5. P. 417–422. DOI: 10.1080/1743873X.2016.1265972.
Bruggeman S. C. Boston’s freedom trail and urban renewal: An introduction to public history debates. Historical Journal of Massachusetts. 2023. Vol. 51. Iss. 1. P. 2–15. URL: https://www.westfield.ma.edu/historicaljournal/ wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Editors-Choice- Lost-on-Freedom-Trail.pdf (Last accessed: 09.04.2024).
Chark R. Midnight in Paris: On heritage and nostalgia. Annals of Tourism Research. Vol. 90. 103266. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2021.103266.
Grodach C. Beyond Bilbao: rethinking flagship cultural development and planning in three California cities. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2010. Vol. 29. Iss. 3. P. 353–366. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X09354452.
Grodach C. Museums as urban catalysts: the role of urban design in flagship cultural development. Journal of Urban Design. 2008. Vol. 13. Iss. 2. P. 195–212. DOI: 10.1080/13574800801965742.
Lynch K. The image of the city. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 1960. 194 р.
Paquette J. The policy windows and patterns of cultural itineraries: the case of heritage trails in Hong Kong. Cultural Roads and Itineraries (pp. 155–175). Springer Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-3533-5_8.
Sonkoly G. Urban heritage in Europe: Economic and social revival. London: Routledge, 2023. 240 p.
Spencer-Wood S. M. Creating a more inclusive Boston freedom trail and black heritage trail: An intersectional approach to empowering social justice and equality. Int J Histor Archaeol. 2021. Vol. 25. P. 207–271. DOI: 10.1007/s10761-020-00544-w.
Walker R. A. A theory of suburbanization: Capitalism and the construction of urban space in the United States. In urbanization and urban planning in capitalist society (pp. 383–429). London: Routledge, 2018. 654 p.
Wilson A. L. Here I walk: A thousand miles on foot to Rome with Martin Luther. Brazos Press, 2016. 240 p.
夏雯. 城市遗产足迹视角下的老城区人文游径 构建方法. 规划师. 2024. Vol. 40. Iss. 5. P. 91–96. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2024.05.012.
宋晓青. 现代主义之后的新都市主 义设计时代. 现代装饰 (理论). 2016. Iss. 9. P. 120–120. URL: https://lib.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/De tail?id=88689083504849544857494848 (Last accessed: 07.21.2024).
杨祥祥.香港步行道边界功能设计研究 [博士学位 论文,武汉理工大学]. 2020. P. 277. DOI: 10.27381/d.cnki. gwlgu.2020.001939.
潘长学, 杨祥祥, 邵健伟. 基于空间节点的香港步 行道边界功能需求分析. 设计艺术研究. 2020. Vol. 10. Iss. 1. P. 12–19. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.2095-0705.2020.01.004.
邱书杰. 作为城市公共空间的城市街道空间规划 策略. 建筑学报. 2007. Vol. 3. P. 9–14. DOI: 10.3969/j. issn.0529-1399.2007.03.005.
陈劼. 城市触媒理论的文献综述. 城市建筑.2019. Vol. 16, Iss. 07. P. 41–43. DOI: 10.19892/j.cnki. csjz.2019.07.009.
陈蔚镇, 刘荃. 作为城市触媒的景观. 建 筑学报. 2016. Vol. 12. P. 88–93. DOI: 10.3969/j. issn.0529-1399.2016.12.013.