FUNCTIONAL AND AESTHETIC INTEGRATION OF STREET FURNITURE IN URBAN PARK DESIGN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2025.36.27Keywords:
urban furniture, urban park, public space, landscape design, design integration, symbiosis, public health, aesthetic value.Abstract
Abstract. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role and conceptual foundations of modern street furniture within the broader context of urban park and mental health landscape design. It explores how street furniture contributes to both the functional and aesthetic dimensions of public space, influencing material choices, user interaction, and cultural significance. Particular attention is paid to clarifying the relationship between street furniture and spatial planning, identifying design approaches that enhance the overall effectiveness and visual quality of public environments. Methodology. This research employs a comprehensive literature review and case study analysis to investigate contemporary design strategies for integrating street furniture into public landscape environments. It focuses on examples drawn from mental health-oriented public spaces to evaluate the conceptual and practical coherence of urban furniture design. The study highlights principles of spatial harmony, functionality, and user-centered planning, aiming to uncover viable pathways toward integrating design aesthetics with everyday utility. Results. The findings introduce a design framework that emphasizes the harmonious coexistence of aesthetics and environment in public landscape spaces. The proposed concept is grounded in user-centered criteria – visual engagement, participatory interaction, and psychological comfort. By addressing these dimensions, the study outlines how modern street furniture can foster inclusive, mentally supportive environments. The results contribute to the development of public spaces that align with collective psychological expectations and promote well-being through thoughtful spatial and object design. Scientific novelty. This study proposes a comprehensive design approach that integrates street furniture with the spatial and aesthetic structure of urban park landscapes. It introduces the concept of a “dual-function environmental module” that simultaneously meets recreational, therapeutic, and visual needs of users. The research highlights how healing-oriented spatial zoning – through active and semiactive zones – combined with harmonized urban furniture placement can enhance user experience. The proposed model promotes a symbiotic relationship between aesthetics, functionality, and user interaction, which is underexplored in previous environmental design literature. Practical relevance. This study provides a targeted analysis of the integration of architectural materials, aesthetic principles, and functional requirements in the context of public health-oriented urban spaces. It highlights how these components can be cohesively designed to enhance the usability, accessibility, and sensory experience of outdoor public areas. Emphasizing the role of street furniture within health-conscious urban environments, the research proposes design strategies that establish a symbiotic relationship between built elements and the surrounding landscape. These strategies are informed by cultural identity, civic engagement, and visual harmony, offering practical insights for the development of inclusive, sustainable, and emotionally supportive public spaces.
References
Abusaada H., Elshater A. Effect of people on placemaking and affective atmospheres in city streets. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2021. Vol. 12(3). Р. 3389–3403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.asej.2021.04.019.
Arruda A., Moroni I., Bezerra P., Silva P., de Paiva R.B.F. Practical Urban: The Urban Furniture and Its Relationship with the City. In: Soares M.M., Falcão C. (eds). Advances in Ergonomics Modeling, Usability & Special Populations. AHFE 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer, Cham. 2016. Vol. 485. P. 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-41983-1_39.
Askarizad R., Safari H. The influence of social interactions on the behavioral patterns of the people in urban spaces (case study: The pedestrian zone of Rasht Municipality Square, Iran). Cities. 2020. Vol. 101. Р. 102687. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cities.2020.102687.
Askarizad R., He J. The role of urban furniture in promoting gender equality and static social activities in public spaces. Acta Societatis Technologiae Japonicae. 2024. Vol. 13(1). Р. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.asej.2024.103250.
Basu N., Oviedo-Trespalacios O., King M., Kamruzzaman M., Haque M. The influence of the built environment on pedestrians’ perceptions of attractiveness, safety and security. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2022. Vol. 87. P. 203–218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.trf.2022.03.006.
Bulduk B. An analysis of the use of urban furniture in city advertising in terms of aesthetic/visual appreciation training: city design. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012. Vol. 46. P. 3279–3283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.051.
Chen Y., Liu H. Design for inclusive and sustainable street furniture in urban environments. Landscape Architecture Frontiers. 2020. Vol. 8(1). Р. 34–45.
Creus M.Q. Espacios, furniture urban elements. In: Serra J. Urban elements, furniture y microarchitecture. Barcelona: Ed. Gustavo Gili; 1996. P. 6–14.
Gnatiuk L. R., Zhuravlova K. S. Environmental Design of the Rehabilitation Center. Theory and practice of design. 2024. Vol. 4(34). P. 229–236. doi: https:// doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2024.34.26.
Guedes J. B. Design no Urbano: Metodologia de Análise Visual de Equipamentos no Meio Urbano : дис. ... д-ра наук : 24.00.00 ; Desenvolvimento Urbano. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2005. 241 с.
Herring E. Street Furniture Design: The Challenges of Modernism in Post-War Britain. London: Routledge, 2016. 240 с.
Inoue T., Manabe R., Murayama A., Koizumi H. Landscape value in urban neighborhoods: A pilot analysis using street-level images. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2022. Vol. 221. P. 104357. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104357.
John N. M., Da Luz Reis A. T. Percepção, estética e uso do mobiliário urbano. Gestão & Tecnologia de Projetos. 2010. Vol. 5(2). P. 180–206. doi: https: //doi.org/10.4237/gtp.v5i2.106.
Ma Q., Wei X., Ren G. Street Design Guidelines and Urban Road System Improvement: From Traffic Volume to Space Quality. Transportation Research Procedia. 2024. Vol. 72. P. 3267–3282. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.trpro.2024.12.095.
Mourthé C. R. Mobiliário urbano em diferentes cidades brasileiras: um estudo comparativo: Dissertação (Mestrado em Arquitetura e Urbanismo). Universidade de São Paulo; 1998.
Mumford L. A cidade na história: suas origens, transformações e perspectivas. 4ª ed. Trad. Neil R. Da Silva. São Paulo: Martins Fontes; 1988. P. 9–36, 521–551.
National Association of City Transportation Officials. Urban Street Design Guide. Washington, D.C.: Island Press; 2013. P. 250–258.
Pearson C.A. Streets and Squares. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011. P. 15–16.
Ragheb S.A., Faragallah R.N. User-Oriented Urban Furniture Indicators to Enhance Placemaking Approach. HBRC Journal. 2024. Vol. 21(1). P. 37–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/16874048.2024.2435698.
Rui Q., Cheng H. Quantifying the spatial quality of urban streets with open street view images: A case study of the main urban area of Fuzhou. Ecological Indicators. 2023. Vol. 153. Article 111204. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecolind.2023.111204.
Tülek B., Timur Ö.B., Karaca E., Timur U.P. Çankırı urban landscape. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2023. Vol. 14(11). Article 102619. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.asej.2023.102619.
Tian M, Li Z, Xia Q, Peng Y, Cao ‚T, Du T, et al. Walking in China’s historical and cultural streets: the factors affecting pedestrian walking behavior and walking experience. Land. 2022. Vol. 11(9): 1491. doi: https:// doi.org/10.3390/land11091491.
Малік Т.В., Пащенко Г.В., Житник К.С. Дизайн-концепція ландшафтного простору відновлюваних територій на прикладі житлового кварталу в м. Гостомель Київської області за допомогою 3D-інструментів. Теорія та практика дизайну. Київ : КАІ, 2024. Вип. 4(34). C. 517–523. doi: https:// doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2024.34.56.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Лі Ченьсі, Тетяна Булгакова

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










