THE INFLUENCE OF THE NATURE OF POLITICS ON THE ETHICAL REGULATION FUNCTIONING SYSTEM IN THE PARLIAMENT: A POLITICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/2412-2157.39.18473

Keywords:

professional ethics, parliament, parliamentary ethics, democracy, competition

Abstract

Introduction. There has been a recent trend where the system of regulating the behavior of Members of Parliament (MPs) on ethics issues is increasingly failing to meet its objectives, and regular reforms have produced contradictory results in the parliaments of many countries where such a system is implemented. Modern parliamentary ethics faces many challenges. At the same time, it is also influenced by the nature of politics. The aim and tasks. The article aims to identify the main manifestations of the impact of the nature of politics on the functioning of the parliamentary ethics system. Achieving this goal involves analysing the political and legal status of MPs; identifying the peculiarities of modern democracy that create complex conditions for the functioning of the ethics system in parliament; and determining the consistency between the requirements for MPs both from the side of politics and the side of public service. Research methods. Systematic and political-philosophical approaches are the methodological basis of the research. Research results. It was found that the work of the parliamentary system of ethical regulation is complicated by differences in the political and legal status of MPs between de jure as champions of the national good and de facto as representatives of the interests of certain political groups. Modern politics is highly competitive, and the functioning of the ethics system in parliament takes place in a sharp struggle for power. Ethical issues themselves may be considered politically inappropriate and ignored. Moreover, MPs are under pressure from competing demands from politics and the state service. Discussion. Our results are generally consistent with those previously obtained by Professor M. Philp. The relationship between ethics and modern politics has several dimensions, which are not always easy to reconcile. Specifically, there is a power struggle, political competition in parliament, and the dual demands on MPs. Conclusions. The nature of politics in modern democratic society generally complicates the functioning of the system of ethical regulation of MPs' behavior.

References

Allegretti A. Tory MP avoids suspension after Boris Johnson intervenes in sleaze row. Owen Paterson escapes sanction after MPs vote for shake-up of rules on parliamentary conduct. The Guardian. 2021. 3 Nov. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/ politics/2021/nov/03/tory-mp-owen-paterson-avoids-suspension-boris-johnson-sleaze-row (дата звернення: 15.01.2024).

Babington Ch., Morgan D. Ethics Truce Frays in House. The Washington Post. 2004. 17 March. URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2004/03/17/ethics-truce-frays-in-house/562a7556-5715-40e4-b1f9-797f75f6a89e/? utm_term=.142636a4dd60 (дата звернення: 03.01.2024).

Blick A., Hennessy P. Good Chaps No More? Safeguarding the Constitution in Stressful Times. London: The Constitution Society, 2019. 35 p.

Code of Ethics For Government Service, House proceeding, Congressional Record, vol. 103, part 12 (August 28, 1957), P. 16184-16383.

Levin R. M. Congressional Ethics and Constitutent Advocacy in an Age of Mistrust. The Michigan Law Review. Vol. 95. Is. 1. 1996. 110 p.

Madison J. Federalist No. 10. New York Packet. November 23, 1788. URL: https://guides.loc.gov/ federalist-papers/text-1-10#s-lg-box-wrapper-25493273 (дата звернення: 06.01.2024).

Opinion on the amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine adopted on 8.12.2004 adopted by the Commission at its 63rd plenary session (Venice, 10-11 June 2005). Strasbourg, 2005. 9 p.

Philp M. Public ethics and political judgment. London : The Committee on Standards in Public Life. 2014. 12 p.

Sartori G. The Theory of Democracy Revisited . Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, 1987. 271 p.

Saunders R. Has the «good chaps» theory of government always been a myth? The problem is not that our politicians are more devious but that we have stopped carin. Prospect. August 3. 2021. URL: https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/has-the-good-chaps-theory-of-government-always-been-a-myth-peter-hennessy-boris-johnson (дата звернення: 04.01.2024).

Schmitter P., Karl T. What Democracy Is… and Is Not. Journal of Democracy. 1991. № 2(3). Р. 75-88.

Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. 460 p.

Standards in Public Life. First Report of Committee on Standards in Public Life. Chairman Lord Nolan. Volume 1: Report. London: HMSO. 1995. 114 p.

Sullivan A. U.S. House Republicans weaken ethics body as they return to Congress. Reuters, January 3, 2017. URL: https://www.reuters.com/ article/ us-usa-congress-ethics-idUSKBN14N03E/ (дата звернення: 15.01.2024).

Thompson D. F. Ethics in congress: From individual to institutional corruption, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1995. 256 p.

Thompson D. F. Overcoming the Conflict of Interest in Congressional Ethics. Washington, D.C., 2007. 22 p.

Арбластер Е. Ключові ідеї демократії. Демократія: антологія / упоряд. О. Проценко. К.: Смолоскип, 2005. С. 41-78.

Боббіо Н. Майбутнє демократії. Демократія: антологія / упоряд. О. Проценко. К.: Смолоскип, 2005. С. 105-119.

Вебер М. Політика як покликання і професія. Харьків: Літера Нова, 2018. 225 с.

Конституція України: від 28 черв. 1996 р. № 254к/96-ВР. Відомості Верховної Ради України. 1996. № 30. cт. 141. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр#n4435 (дата звернення: 09.01.2024).

Published

2024-04-22