PRINCIPLE OF LEGAL DETERMINATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.52.13934Keywords:
legal science, constitutional state, legal system, separation of powers, government, the rule of law, law supremacy, legal certainty, legal normsAbstract
Purpose: conducting a detailed analysis of the formation and development of the principle of legal certainty, taking into account the diversity of opinions existing in the legal literature. Methods: analysis of conceptual ideas and legal documents on the principle of legal certainty. Results: the article provides a detailed analysis of the issues of formation and development of the principle of legal certainty, taking into account the diversity of opinions existing in the legal literature. It is noted that in the field of law and practice, the principle of legal certainty is one of the main elements of the rule of law. The European Court of Human Rights has in a number of its decisions characterized the principle of legal certainty. For example, in the judgment of the Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine the European Court of Justice stated that the principle of legal certainty is one of the fundamental aspects of the rule of law (rule of law). The European Court of Justice, which is the highest judicial body of the European Union, emphasized that the principle of legal certainty is an integral part of European law, therefore, all structural bodies of the European Union, as well as member states, are required to comply with this principle. Further in the article, the principle of legal certainty is considered as a constitutional principle, which for a long period of time is organically linked with the concept of the rule of law in Germany. It was from German law that this principle was introduced into international law, in particular, in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, as well as in national legal systems. Discussion: conducting scientific discussions on the consolidation of the principle of legal certainty in any international treaty, including the European Convention on Human Rights.
References
Baranowski v. Poland (28.03.2000). URL: www.echr.coe.int; Ryabykh v. Russia (24 July 2003). URL: www.echr.coe.int; Kutepov and Anikeyenko v. Russia (25 October 2005). URL: www.echr.coe.int; Beian v. Romaina (06.12.2007). URL: www.echr.coe.int. https://doi.org/ 10.5040/9781509911820.ch-010
Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine (25 July 2002). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Raitio J. The Principle of Legal Certainty in EC Law. Berlin-Heidelberg-Dordrecht, Springer Science and Business Media, 2003, 398 p.
Marckx v. Belgium (13.06.1979), Publications of the European Court of Human Rights, Series A, vol. 31.
Fuller L. The Morality of Law. New Haven, Yale University Press, revised edition, 1973, p. 262.
Korbely v. Hungary (19.09.2008). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Brumarescu v. Romania (28.10.1999). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Rahmanova v. Azerbaijan (10.08.2008). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Miragall Escolano v. Spain (25.01.2000). URL: www.echr.coe.int; Phinikari-dou v. Cyprus (20.12.2007). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Beian v. Romania (06.12.2007). URL: www.echr.coe.int
The Council of Europe and the Rule of Law - An overview, CM (2008)170, 21 November 2008.
Matheus v. Belgium (31.03.2005). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Taskin and Others v. Turkey (30.03.2005). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Baranowski v. Poland, (28.03.2000). URL: www.echr.coe.int, Svipsta v. Latvia (09.03.2006). URL: www.echr.coe.int
The Council of Europe and the Rule of Law - An overview, CM (2008) 170, 21 November 2008.
References
Baranowski v. Poland (28.03.2000). URL: www.echr.coe.int; Ryabykh v. Russia (24 July 2003). URL: www.echr.coe.int; Kutepov and Anikeyenko v. Russia (25 October 2005). URL: www.echr.coe.int; Beian v. Romaina (06.12.2007). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine (25 July 2002). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Raitio J. The Principle of Legal Certainty in EC Law. Berlin-Heidelberg-Dordrecht, Springer Science and Business Media, 2003, 398 p.
Marckx v. Belgium (13.06.1979), Publications of the European Court of Human Rights, Series A, vol. 31.
Fuller L. The Morality of Law. New Haven, Yale University Press, revised edition, 1973, p. 262.
Korbely v. Hungary (19.09.2008). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Brumarescu v. Romania (28.10.1999). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Rahmanova v. Azerbaijan (10.08.2008). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Miragall Escolano v. Spain (25.01.2000), www.echr.coe.int; Phinikari-dou v. Cyprus (20.12.2007). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Beian v. Romania (06.12.2007). URL: www.echr.coe.int
The Council of Europe and the Rule of Law - An overview, CM (2008)170, 21 November 2008.
Matheus v. Belgium (31.03.2005). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Taskin and Others v. Turkey (30.03.2005). URL: www.echr.coe.int
Baranowski v. Poland, (28.03.2000). URL: www.echr.coe.int, Svipsta v. Latvia (09.03.2006). URL: www.echr.coe.int
The Council of Europe and the Rule of Law - An overview, CM (2008) 170, 21 November 2008.