IS IT NECESSARY TO DRAFT A NEW OUTER SPACE TREATY FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.76.20514Keywords:
1967 Space Treaty, commercial space activities, Corpus Iuris Spatialis, hybridization of new subjects and objects of law, Space Law, spacefaring superpowers, UNCOPUOSAbstract
Purpose: to describe and study the 1967 Space Treaty in the context of current space activities involving new subjects and objects of law. The document highlights the Treaty’s continued relevance due to its broad and general wording, which allows it to address a wide range of cases, while questioning the necessity of drafting a new Space Treaty for when mankind sets foot on Mars. Research methods: study of specialized bibliography and the Corpus Iuris Spatialis, and analysis of information related to space industry. In addition, the author conducted interviews with space law experts and professors Robin J. Frank, Frans G. von der Dunk, and Marta Gaggero Montaner, which are included in the Interview Appendix. Results: 1) Articles II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, XI and XIII, are legal limitations to the principle of freedom of exploration and use enshrined in Article I of the 1967 Space Treaty; 2) Today, new terms and definitions are being developed not only within UNCOPUOS but also through the national space legislation of countries with space capabilities; 3) For mankind to set foot on Mars in a sustainable manner and establish permanent human and AI-operated settlements, the U.S. and the People’s Republic of China, current spacefaring superpowers, will need to adopt common and binding international rules applicable to all, for the greater good and the survival of our species. Discussion: is it realistic for us, as space lawyers, to consider the possibility of drafting a new Space Treaty for the twenty-first century? Does the classical characteristic of predictability of space law urge us to act?
References
See Hermida, La explotación comercial del espacio exterior y de la Luna, in Pons (ed.), Nuevos enfoques del Derecho Aeronáutico y Espacial, Madrid 2025, p. 418.
See for details H.R. 5382, Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act, 108th Cong., 2004, 118 Stat. 3975 et seq.
See for details Public Law 114–90, U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act, § 112(c) (Definition of Government Astronaut), 2015, 129 Stat. 712.
See for details Erices Bravo, Human Spaceflight: U.S. National Legislations and Regulations as Space Sherpas Paving the Path, in Scientific Works of Kyiv Aviation Institute (ed.), Law Journal “Air and Space Law”, Vol. 4, No. 73, Kyiv 2024, p. 14 et seq. URL: https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.73.19410.
See for details Erices Bravo, Space Re-sources: A New Balance of Interests for the 21st Century, in Scientific Works of Kyiv Aviation Institute (ed.), Law Journal “Air and Space Law”, Vol. 3, No. 72, Kyiv 2024, p. 11. URL: https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.72.19042.
See The Artemis Accords, Principles for Cooperation in the Civil Exploration and Use of the Moon, Mars, Comets, and Asteroids for Peaceful Purposes in NASA (ed.), 2020. URL: https://www.nasa.gov/artemis-accords/.
See Ferrer (h), in Plus Ultra (ed.), Derecho Espacial, Buenos Aires 1976, p. 155.
See United Nations General Assembly, Sixty-fourth session of the Legal Subcommittee of UNCOPUOS, Status of International Agreements relating to activities in outer space as at 1 January 2025, A/AC.105/C.2/2025/CRP.9, p. 10.
See United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), International Space Law: United Nations Instruments, ST/SPACE/61/Rev.3, New York 2025.
See for details Marchisio, Art. IX, in Hobe/Schmidt-Tedd/Schrogl (eds.), Cologne Commentary on Space Law, Vol. I, Berlin 2017, p. 555.
See for details von der Dunk, A Sleeping Beauty Awakens: The 1968 Rescue Agreement After Forty Years, in Center for Air and Space Law (ed.), Journal of Space Law, Vol. 34, No. 2, Oxford, Miss. 2008, p. 412.
See for details Cheng, The 1967 Space Treaty, in Clarendon Press Oxford (ed.), Studies in International Space Law, UK 1997, pp. 296 et seq.
See Interview Appendix, Professor Frank’s response to Question No. 1.
See Interview Appendix, Professor von der Dunk’s response to Question No. 2.
See Filho, À Luz do Direito Espacial, in Oliveira/Cubo (ed.), Brasil-China – 20 Anos de Cooperação Espacial, São Carlos, SP 2009, p. 82.
Se for details Cheng, The Commercial Development of Space: the Need for New Treaties, in Clarendon Press Oxford (ed.), Studies in International Space Law, UK 1997, pp. 692 et seq.
See Cocca, in Asociación Argentina de Ciencias Aeroespaciales (ed.), Derecho Espacial para la gran audiencia, Buenos Aires 1970, p. 60.
See Interview Appendix, responses by space law experts to Question No. 3.
See Ferrer (Jr.) in Plus Ultra (ed.), Derecho Espacial, Buenos Aires 1976, p. 36.
See Cheng, The Commercial Development of Space: the Need for New Treaties, op. cit., pp. 673 et seq.
See United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), International Space Law: United Nations Instruments, op. cit., p. 4.
Ibid.
See Filho, Direito e Política na Era Espacial. Podemos ser mais justos no espaço do que na Terra? in Vieira & Lent (ed.), Rio de Janeiro 2007, p. 65.
See Williams, in Abeledo-Perrot, Derecho Internacional Contemporáneo. La utilización del espacio ultraterrestre, Buenos Aires 1990, p. 180.
Ibid.
See Buono, in NASA History Office (ed.), Series: Monographs in Aerospace History, No. 59, Governing the Moon, a History. A Report for NASA’s Office of Technology, Policy, and Strategy, Washington, DC 2025, p. 7.
See for details UN Web TV, Sixty-third session of the Legal Subcommittee of UNCOPUOS, 2024. URL: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1w/ k1wuklzc5x.
See Interview Appendix, Professor Gaggero Montaner’s response to Question No. 1.
See for details Trump, Donald J. (1st Term, 2017–2021), Executive Order 13914: Encouraging International Support for the Recovery and Use of Space Resources, White House, April 6, 2020.
See The Artemis Accords, op. cit., p. 4.
See Erices Bravo, Space Resources: A New Balance of Interests for the 21st Century, op cit., p. 11.
See for details Lei N°14.946, de 31 de Julho de 2024 que institui normas aplicáveis às atividades espaciais nacionais. URL: https://www.planalto. gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/lei/ l14946.htm.
Ibid.
See United Nations General Assembly, Report of the Legal Subcommittee on its sixtieth session, held in Vienna from 31 May to 11 June 2021, A/AC.105/1243, p. 33, para. 255.
See United Nations General Assembly, Sixty-fourth session of the Legal Subcommittee of UNCOPUOS, Initial draft set of recommended principles for space resource activities, A/AC.105/C.2/L.339, p. 8.
See for details Schrogl & Newmann, Article IV, in Hobe/Schmidt-Tedd/Schrogl (eds.), Cologne Commentary on Space Law, Vol. I, Berlin 2017, pp. 316-317.
See Commercial Space Launch Amend-ments Act of 2004, op. cit., 118 Stat. 3975.
See U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act, op. cit., 129 Stat. 712.
See Erices Bravo, Human Spaceflight: U.S. National Legislations and Regulations as Space Sherpas Paving the Path, op. cit., p. 14 et seq.
See Interview Appendix, Professor von der Dunk’s response to Question No. 2.
See for details Cheng, Article VI of the 1967 Space Treaty Revisited: “International Responsibility”, “National Activities”, and “The Appropriate State”, in Center for Air and Space Law (ed.), Journal of Space Law (Twenty–Fifth Anniversary), Vol. 26. No. 1, Oxford, Miss. 1998, p. 27.
Ibid., p. 14.
Ibid.
Ibid., p. 15.
See for details Cheng, The Extraterrestrial Application of International Law, in Clarendon Press Oxford (ed.), Studies in International Space Law, UK 1997, pp. 121-124.
See Gaggero Montaner, Vacíos normativos en materia de responsabilidad espacial. El problema de los desechos espaciales, in Centro de Investigación y Difusión Aeronáutico-Espacial (CIDA-E) (ed.), 40°Aniversario CIDA-E. Recopilación de Trabajos 1975 – 2015, Montevideo 2015, p. 1189 et seq.
See United Nations General Assembly, The Pact for the Future, Action 56, Seventy-ninth session, A/RES/79/1, p. 37.
See Erices Bravo, Human Spaceflight: U.S. National Legislations and Regulations as Space Sherpas Paving the Path, op. cit., p. 15.
