TERMINOLOGIES OF COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN: ISSUES IN TERM DEFINITION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2025.35.35Keywords:
computational design, generative design, algorithmic design, parametric design, digital design, design methods, terminology, design automationAbstract
The article addresses the issue of ambiguity and lack of unification in the terminology of computational design, in particular the concepts of “generative design”, “algorithmic design” and “parametric design” in the Ukrainian academic environment. An analysis of English-language studies revealed key interpretations of these concepts, the characteristics of each approach, their differences and similarities, and the specifics of their application. The purpose of the work is to review terminology in the English-speaking scientific context, identify differences between methods, and propose the unification of computational design terminology in Ukraine. Methodology. To achieve the research objectives, an analysis of the most commonly used terms in computational design was conducted. The study identified the most frequently used terms in the literature and those requiring clarification – specifically, terms with equivalent usage, such as “computational design”, «generative design», «parametric design» and «algorithmic design». This analysis serves as a basis for creating proposed terminology within the Ukrainian context of research and practice in design and architecture. It aims to clearly define the conceptual and operational scope of each term, prevent the interchangeable use of different terms, and clarify potential combinations between them. The research consists of three stages: 1. Identifying the most relevant terms in computational design; 2. Collecting and comparing definitions of these terms. 3. Proposing a consistent and well-grounded terminology for computational design. Results. The concepts of “computational design”, “generative design”, “parametric design” and “algorithmic design” are described and unified, a hierarchical model is described which demonstrates the relationship between the terms, and the unique features and limitations of these methods are summarized in a matrix. Scientific novelty. For the first time in Ukrainian scientific research, such concepts as computational design, generative design, algorithmic design, and parametric design are distinguished. Practical relevance. The results of the study and the proposed unification of terms can contribute to the unification of terminology, which will facilitate scientific communication between researchers and practitioners, the proposed model of relationships between terms and the matrix of features and limitations of these methods can be used to create educational materials on computational design.
References
Abdelmohsen S. M. Reconfiguring architectural space using generative design and digital fabrication: a project based course. 17th Conference of the iberoamerican society of digital graphics: Knowledge based design. Blucher design proceedings. São Paulo. 2014. Vol. 1. № 7, p. 391–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5151/despro-sigradi2013-0074
Abrishami S., Goulding J., Rahimian F. P., Ganah A. Integration of BIM and generative design to exploit AEC conceptual design innovation. Information technology in construction. 2014. Vol. 19. P. 350–359. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265421507_Integration_of_BIM_and_generative_design_to_exploit_AEC_conceptual_design_innovation (Accessed: 22.01.2025)
Agkathidis A. Generative design. London : Quercus, 2016. 160 p. URL: https://www.researchgate.n e t / p u b l i c a t i o n / 2 9 9 4 5 7 5 4 5 _ G e n e ra t i ve _ D e s i g n (Accessed: 22.01.2025)
Buonamici F., Carfagni M., Furferi R., Volpe Y., Governi L. Generative design: an explorative study. Computer-aided design and applications. 2020. Vol. 18, № 1, P. 144–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14733/cadaps.2021.144-155
Caetano I., Leitão A. Architecture meets computation: an overview of the evolution of computational design approaches in architecture. Architectural science review. 2020. Vol. 63, № 2, P. 165–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2019.1680524
Caetano I., Santos L., Leitão A. Computational design in architecture: defining parametric, generative, and algorithmic design. Frontiers of architectural research. 2020. Vol. 9, № 2, P. 287–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.12.008
Chaszar A., Joyce S. C. Generating freedom: questions of flexibility in digital design and architectural computation. International journal of architectural computing. 2016. Vol. 14, № 2, P. 167–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077116638945
Eltaweel A., SU Y. Parametric design and daylighting: a literature review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 2017. Vol. 73. P. 1086–1103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.011
Fischer T., Herr C. M. Teaching generative design. Proceedings of the 4th conference on generative art. Milan, 2001. P. 147–160. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30869860_Teaching_Generative_Design (Accessed: 22.01.2025)
Frazer J. Chapter 9 – Creative design and the generative evolutionary paradigm. Creative evolutionary systems. 2002. P. 253–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-155860673-9/50047-1
Humppi H., Österlund T. Algorithm-aided BIM. eCAADe 2016: Complexity & simplicity, Oulu, Finland, 24–26 August 2016. P. 601–609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2016.2.601
Kolarevic B. Architecture in the digital age: Design and manufacturing, Taylor and Francis, New York, 2004, 320 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203634561
Queiroz N., Dantas N., Nome C., Vaz, C. Designing a Building envelope using parametric and algorithmic processes. 19th Conference of the iberoamerican society of digital graphics. Blucher design proceedings. 2015. Vol. 2, № 3. P. 797–801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5151/despro-sigradi2015-sp90284
Sarcar M. M. M., Rao K. M., Narayan K. L. Computer aided design and manufacturing. New Delhi : PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd, 2008. 186 p. URL: https://books.google.co.ck/books?id=zXdivq93WIUC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_vpt_reviews#v=onepage&q&f=false (Accessed: 22.01.2025)
Szalapaj P. CAD principles for architectural design. London : Routledge, 2013. 256 P. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315042794
Terzidis K. 2006. Algorithmic architecture. London : Routledge, 2006. 176 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080461298
Terzidis K., Isorna J.M., Srinivasan V. Algorithmic design: a paradigm shift in architecture? 22nd International conference on education and research in computer aided architectural design in Europe. 15-18 September 2004, 2004. P. 201–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2004.201
Jabi W. Parametric design for architecture. London : Laurence King Publishing, 2013. 208 p. URL: https://archive.org/details/cvrt-ave-jabi-wassim-parametricdesign-for-architecture-laurence-king-publishing-2013/page/207/mode/2up (Accessed: 22.01.2025)
Woodbury R. Elements of Parametric Design. 1st ed. New York : Routledge, 2010. 300 p. URL: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/7366617/mod_resource/content/1/woodbury%20elements%20of%20parametric%20design.pdf (Accessed: 22.01.2025)
Zboinska M. A. Hybrid CAD/E platform supporting exploratory architectural design. Computer-Aided Design, 2015. Vol. 59, P. 64–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.08.029










