FEATURES OF APPLYING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN PRODUCT DESIGN CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT USING THE FOCAL OBJECTS METHOD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2025.38.1.12Keywords:
product design, generative artificial intelligence, Method of Focal Objects, design concept, creative thinking, visualization, ideation, design educationAbstract
The article analyzes international and national experiences in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in education and outlines the legal and regulatory framework for their implementation. The need for developing clear rules and recommendations on the ethical applying of generative AI in academia is emphasized. Current approaches to integrating AI technologies into the educational process of design specialties are examined. The research explores contemporary trends in the application of artificial intelligence technologies in education, particularly within the Design field. The purpose of the study is to analyze the potential of artificial intelligence (AI), especially generative models, in developing a product design concept using the Method of Focal Objects (MFO). Methodology. The study employs a comprehensive approach that combines theoretical analysis of recent scientific publications, a comparative method, and experimental modeling of the ideation process using generative AI tools. The Method of Focal Objects is considered as an algorithmic basis for creating new visual and functional solutions, while AI functions as an analytical assistant in selecting, combining, and visualizing creative ideas. Results. The study revealed that the rapid development and dissemination of AI technologies, particularly generative models, significantly affect the structure, content, and methodology of the educational process. The key stages of integrating AI into the process of developing a design concept are identified: defining characteristics/ properties of auxiliary objects, selecting associative series, generating creative combinations, analyzing results, and constructing a design model. It is demonstrated that the use of AI reduces the time required for idea generation, expands the designer’s associative field, and enables the emergence of unexpected yet potentially functional solutions. A practical scheme of interaction between MFO and AI is proposed. It is concluded that the higher education system have to adapt its approaches to learning, teaching, and assessment, taking into account technological innovations and the principles of academic integrity. Scientific novelty. For the first time, the methodological interaction between the Method of Focal Objects and generative AI in product design has been substantiated. A model of the creative process is proposed, in which AI algorithms act as a catalyst for creative thinking rather than a substitute for the designer. An analogy between the cognitive principles of the Method of Focal Objects and the architecture of generative models has been identified. Practical relevance. The findings can be applied in the professional training of designers to develop creative thinking skills and effective collaboration with AI tools. The proposed approach contributes to optimizing the conceptual design process, fostering an individual creative style, and enhancing the competitiveness of design solutions in the digital era. The results can also be used to develop methodological recommendations for integrating AI tools into higher education curricula. The conclusions of the study support the improvement of teacher training for working with generative technologies and the development of educational programs aimed at fostering ethical, digital, and civic competencies among students.
References
Artiukhov, A., Demchuk, P., Dubno, O., Zakharchenko, T., Klymchuk, S., Kobryn, A., ta in. (2025). Rekomendatsii shchodo vidpovidalnoho vprovadzhennia ta vykorystannia tekhnolohii shtuchnoho intelektu v zakladakh vyshchoi osvity [Recommendations on the responsible implementation and use of artificial intelligence technologies in higher education institutions]. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/static-objects/mon/sites/1/news/2025/04/24/shi-v-zakladakh-vyshchoiosvity-24-04-2025.pdf (Accessed: 08.10.2025) [in Ukrainian].
Dereza, O.O., & Vodianytskyi, I.O. (2024). Vykorystannia shtuchnoho intelektu v dyzaini [Use of artificial intelligence in design]. Ukrainski studii v yevropeiskomu konteksti, (8), 155–160 [in Ukrainian].
Deryabina, S.V., Nikitenko, R.I., & Cheshenko, O.I. (2024). Vykorystannia instrumentiv shtuchnoho intelektu v diialnosti pedahohiv mystetskoi/tekhnolohichnoi osvitnikh haluzei [Use of artificial intelligence tools in the activities of teachers of the art/technological educational fields]. International Science Journal of Education & Linguistics, 3(6), 9–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjel.20240306.02 [in Ukrainian].
Drach, I., Petroie, O., Borodienko, O., Reheilo, I., Bazeliuk, O., Bazeliuk, N., & Slobodianiuk, O. (2023). Vykorystannia shtuchnoho intelektu u vyshchii osviti [Use of artificial intelligence in higher education]. Mizhnarodnyi naukovyi zhurnal universytetiv ta liderstva, (15), 66–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31874/2520-6702-2023-15-66-82 [in Ukrainian].
Dushchenko, O. (2024). Ohliad naukovykh pidkhodiv do vykorystannia tekhnolohii shtuchnoho intelektu v osvitnomu protsesi [Review of scientific approaches to the use of artificial intelligence technologies in the educational process]. Osvitolohichnyi dyskurs, 46(3), 6–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829/2024.3.1 [in Ukrainian].
Kauk, V.I. (2023). Heneratyvnyi shtuchnyi intelekt – kreatyvnyi pomichnyk dyzainera [Generative artificial intelligence – a creative assistant for the designer]. In Polihrafichni, multymediini ta webtekhnolohii. Suchasnyi stan: monohrafiia, pp. 283–294.
Kharkiv: TOV «Drukarnia Madryd». Retrieved from h t t p s : / / o p e n a r c h i v e . n u r e . u a / s e r v e r / a p i / c o r e / bitstreams/445156ed-ed1a-4e42-8eca-f9ca703c2e16/content (Accessed: 08.10.2025) [in Ukrainian].
Kolesnyk, N.Ye. (2024). Vykorystannia tsyfrovykh tekhnolohii ta shtuchnoho intelektu v mystetskomu prostori [Use of digital technologies and artificial intelligence in the artistic space]. In Aktualni problemy suchasnoho dyzainu: zb. materialiv VI Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., 2, 95–97. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Kruhlik, V., Osadchyi, V., Pavlenko, L., & Symonenko, S. (2024). Formuvannia vidkrytoho osvitnoho seredovyshcha z vykorystanniam tekhnolohii shtuchnoho intelektu: analiz ta klasyfikatsiia [Formation of an open educational environment using artificial intelligence technologies: analysis and classification]. Osvitolohichnyi dyskurs, 45(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2024.2.1 [in Ukrainian].
Palamar, S., & Naumenko, M. (2024). Shtuchnyi intelekt v osviti: vykorystannia bez porushennia pryntsypiv akademichnoi chesnosti [Artificial intelligence in education: use without violating academic integrity principles]. Osvitolohichnyi dyskurs, 1(44), 68–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2024.15 [in Ukrainian].
Pylypchuk, O., Shendryk, I., & Polubok, A. (2023). Mozhlyvosti suchasnykh komp’iuternykh tekhnolohii z vykorystanniam shtuchnoho intelektu u stvorenni ob’iektiv obrazotvorchoho mystetstva [Possibilities of modern computer technologies using artificial intelligence in the creation of fine art objects]. Mistobuduvannia ta terytorialne planuvannia, (84), 251–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2023.84.251-262 [in Ukrainian].
Skitsko, O., Skladannyi, P., Shyrshov, R., Humeniuk, M., & Vorokhob, M. (2023). Zahrozy ta ryzyky vykorystannia shtuchnoho intelektu [Threats and risks of using artificial intelligence]. Kiberbezpeka: osvita, nauka, tekhnika, 2(22), 6–18 [in Ukrainian].
Troshkin, A.A., & Makukhin, D.V. (2025). Perspektyvy vykorystannia shtuchnoho intelektu v navchanni arkhitekturi ta dyzainu [Prospects for the use of artificial intelligence in teaching architecture and design]. Teoriia ta praktyka dyzainu. Arkhitektura ta budivnytstvo, 2(36), 136–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2025.36.13 [in Ukrainian]
Pylypchuk, O.D., Polubok, A.P., & Avdieieva, N.Yu. (2022). Using artificial intelligence to create a practical tool for interior design incorporating artwork. In Features of innovative development in the field of technology: the comparative experience of Ukraine and the European Union (pp. 10–13). Riga: Baltija Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-230-2-2 [in English].
Baidoo-anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500 [in English].
Davis, N., Sherson, J., & Rafner, J. (2025). The co-creative design framework for hybrid intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Creativity and Cognition, pp. 560–572 [in English].
Kaiser, Z. (2019). Creativity as computation: Teaching design in the age of automation. Design and Culture, 11(2), 173–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1609279 [in English].
Oh, S., Jung, Y., Kim, S., Lee, I., & Kang, N. (2019). Deep generative design: Integration of topology optimization and generative models. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 141(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044229 [in English].
Poleac, D. (2024). Design thinking with AI. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 18(1), 2891–2900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2024-0240 [in English].
Rastogi, A., & Amarka, M. (2024). Exploring the impact of AI on design education: A comprehensive student perspective. In Sharma, A., & Poovaiah, R. (Eds.), Futuring design education, Volume 1 (FDE 2024). Design Science and Innovation. Singapore: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9206-1_34 [in English].
Yu, C., Zheng, P., Peng, T., Xu, X., Vos, S., & Ren, X. (2025). Design meets AI: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Engineering Design, 36(5–6), 637–641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2025.2484085 [in English].











