CULTURAL CONTINUITY AND INNOVATION: DOOR GOD IMAGERY IN MODERN VISUAL COMMUNICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2025.36.35Keywords:
door god painting, regional style, Chinese folk culture, modern design, traditions, image, cultural heritage, book design, innovation, graphic design, visual communication, museum, cultural heritage.Abstract
Abstract. The purpose. The purpose of this paper is to systematically analyze the evolution of the style of regional door god paintings, revealing how folk art images enter the modern visual context through cultural translation, especially the practical transformation in the medium of book design. The study is not only committed to tracing the historical trajectory of door god images, but also emphasizes the reconstruction of their value in contemporary graphic design, in order to find a sustainable and innovative integration path for traditional visual symbols in modern design language. Methodology. Based on systematic and analytical, comparative, figurative and stylistic, complex historical, and descriptive analysis, which allowed for an in-depth study of the artistic features of door paintings in different regions of China and for drawing reasonable conclusions. The results. The research results show that as a typical representative of traditional folk art, the rich visual language of door god paintings has a high potential for transformation in modern book design. The door god paintings in the four major regions of east, west, south and north have their own characteristics: the eastern region mostly reflects the delicate and gorgeous style with soft lines; the southern region prefers bright colors and exaggerated shapes; the western door gods focus on mysterious atmosphere and religious symbols; and the northern region presents a heavy realistic, majestic and majestic style. These image languages not only provide a source of inspiration for the visual beauty of modern books, but also enhance the cultural depth and emotional resonance of books through the embedding of cultural identity and folk symbols. In the practice of modern book design, these door god images are often used to express the covers, chapter pages or local decorations of festival, folk and historical books, becoming a bridge connecting tradition and modernity, folklore and art. Scientific novelty. The scientific innovation of this study is that, from the perspective of cross-regional comparison, the artistic style of Chinese door god paintings is systematically sorted out, and its evolution model in visual design language is proposed. At the same time, the study combines the analysis of traditional folk images with modern book design practice, and constructs the logical chain of “traditional images-design language-cultural transformation” from the two levels of image culture and design application, providing a new perspective and theoretical support for the regeneration of traditional cultural symbols in the design context. In addition, the study also proposed the strategic method of “visual appropriation and redesign”, that is by retaining the core spirit of traditional images and reshaping them in modern design language in form, the contemporary expression of traditional images can be achieved. Practical relevance. This study not only provides image resources and design ideas for reference for the current book design that increasingly values cultural values, but also provides clear theoretical guidance for designers on how to understand, select and use traditional elements in practice. Especially in publications that emphasize cultural identity and regionality, the regional style classification and application model constructed by the research can effectively improve the cultural accuracy and visual appeal of the design. The study also proposed specific paths for the integration of traditional culture and modern aesthetics, including methods such as element extraction, semantic reconstruction, and media translation, which will help design works convey traditional spirit while having the appeal of modern aesthetics.
References
蔡, 玉硕. 开封朱仙镇门神年画图像研究. 美 术研究. 2016. (4). P. 126–128. DOI: 10.13318/j.cnki. msyj.2016.04.052.
陈, 欲晓. 中国民间年画中人物造型的文化语境. 美术观察. 2014. (9). P. 135–135.
杜, 杰, & 王, 雅雯. 桃花坞与凤翔木版门神画 色彩特征比较研究. 装饰. 2018. (10). P. 113–115. DOI: 10.16272/j.cnki.cn11-1392/j.2018.10.022.
黄, 永春, & 孙, 玉洁. 中国年画的变迁与传播探 析. 出版广角. 2018. 19(325). P. 77–79. DOI: 10.16491/j. cnki.cn45-1216/g2.2018.19.023.
李, 鹏. 辽代墓饰门神图初探. 北方文物. 2015. (4). P. 67–70. DOI: 10.16422/j.cnki.1001-0483.2015.04.013.
马, 滟宁. 弥漫的神性: 传统年画中的民间信仰. 民俗研究. 2021. (6). P. 135–143. DOI: 10.13370/j.cnki. fs.2021.06.015.
欧阳, 秋子. 中国年画之流变及其文化意蕴. 求索. 2019. (6). P. 171–178.
戚, 序, & 贾, 国涛. “马上” 与 “马下”— —析 “门神” 造型的地域分异律. 文艺争鸣. 2011. (06X). P. 38–39.
戚, 序, & 张, 红琼. 公共安全意识变迁与门神 造型的衍变研究. 重庆大学学报 ( 社会科学版). 2014. 20(5). P. 157–162. DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.2014. 05.024.
任, 鹤林, 李, 力, & 任, 涛. 门神与年 画. 装饰. 2016. (1). P. 44–51. DOI: 10.16272/j.cnki. cn11-1392/j.2016.01.010.
孙, 发成. 略论门神信仰. 北京理工大学学 报 ( 社会科学版). 2008. (1). P. 21–24. DOI: 10.15918 /j.jbitss1009—3370.2008.01.007.
商, 亚敏. 论中国武将门神画的艺术特征. 山西档 案. 2014. (3). P. 29–32.
王, 树村. 中国民间美术史. 岭南美术出版社. 2004. P. 215-240.
吴, 天明. 门神文化研究. 中南民族大学学报 (人 文社会科学版). 2002. 22(3). P. 65–69.
吴, 卫光. 中国古代建筑的门饰与门神崇拜. 华南 师范大学学报 (社会科学版). 2002. (4). P. 110–116.
吴, 文勇. 宫廷建筑中门神画管窥. 兰台世界: 中旬. 2014. (12). P. 179-180. DOI: 10.16565/j.cnki. 1006-7744.2014.35.008.
向, 静. 门神的起源与流变——基于民俗文化生态 下的门神造型研究. 民族艺术研究. 2011. 24(6). P. 142–148. DOI: 10.14003/j.cnki.mzysyj.2011.06.008.
解, 玉峰. 门的信仰: 符号与图像. 民 族艺术. 2018. (1). P. 54–65. DOI: 10.16564/ j.cnki.1003-2568.2018.01.008.
张, 春霞. 中国传统年画衰落背景之探究. 中华文 化论坛. 2014. (3). P. 123–127.
张, 伟. 木版年画中 “门神” 造型的发展与演 变. 南京艺术学院学报: 美术与设计. 2007. (4). P. 62–64.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Рен Ютянь, Антоніна Петрівна Дубрівна

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










