A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC EXPERIENCE IN DESIGNING TECHNOPARKS OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2023.29-30.3

Keywords:

technology park, infrastructure, complex, regional development, innovation, development of regions, design experience, design model, enterprise, strategic planning, technological progress, business environment

Abstract

Today, technology parks play an important role in regional development, contributing to innovation, sustainable economic growth and knowledge sharing. In this scientific article, I present a thorough analysis of the global and domestic experience in designing technology parks with the aim of identifying best practices and key aspects for their successful launch and operation. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to systematize and generalize the most important aspects of technopark design as a tool for stimulating the innovative development of regions. Methodology. To achieve this goal, we used the methods of systematic analysis and literature review, as well as conducted an in-depth analysis of data from various sources. Results. This analysis shows that the successful design of technology parks requires careful strategic planning, development of high-quality infrastructure, effective policy support, cooperation with universities and enterprises, as well as integration into the local socio-cultural context. Scientific novelty. This article highlighted current trends in the design of technology parks, taking into account innovative aspects that help promote innovative development. Practical relevance. Understanding and implementing these key factors will allow regions to effectively use the potential of technology parks to support innovation and sustainable economic growth. These results can be useful for organizers and participants in the process of creating and managing technology parks, as well as for regional authorities and the public, who seek to make their regions centers of technological progress.

References

Антипов І.В. Інноваційний розвиток національної економіки в контексті створення інноваційних інфраструктур в освітній галузі. Збірник наукових праць Донецького державного університету управління. 2010. Вип. 148. С. 1–8.

Двигуни інновацій: як працюють найбільші технологічні парки світу. URL: https://investmente s t a t e . c o m / u k / n ovo s t i / d v yg u ny- i n n ova c i y-ya kpracyuyut-naybilshi-tehnologichni-parky-svitu.

Дорошко О.О. Технопарки як засіб стимулювання інноваційної діяльності. Ефективна економіка. 2011. № 1. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=507.

Саліхова О. Досвід Франції та Німеччини зі створення умов для піднесення рівня національних високотехнологічних виробництв. Економіст. 2011. № 11. С. 67–70.

Уханова І.О. Розвиток та функціонування технопарків: світовий досвід та специфіка в Україні : монографія. Одеса, 2012.

Bass S.J. Japanese research parks: national policy and local development. Regional Studies. 1998. Vol. 32. № 5. Р. 391–403.

Fukugawa N. Science parks in Japan and their value added contributions to new technology based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2006. Vol. 24. № 2. Р. 381–400.

Gianluca Carenzo. The Italian Industrial Renaissance: science parks and their role in cluster creation. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308200138_ The_Italian_Industrial_Renaissance_science_parks_ and_their_role_in_cluster_creation.

Hasan Syed. Regional innovation policy in Taiwan and South Korea: Impact of science parks on firm productivity distributions. URL: https://aede.osu.edu/sites/aede/files/publication_files/ScienceParksTaiwanKoreaFullPaper.pdf.

Hu A.G. Technology parks and regional economic growth in China. Research Policy. 2007. Vol. 36. № 1. Р. 76–87.

Jimenez Zarco. Ana Isabel Innovative management of spanish academic science parks: Designing and testing of management tool. Rev. bus. manag. 2013. Vol. 15. № 48. Р. 362–389. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306228795.

Macdonald S. Technology transfer of incubation? Technology business incubators and science and technologies, innovations.Science and Public Policy. 2001. Vol. 28. № 5. Р. 330–344.

Mae Phillips S.A. A place for R&D? The Singapore science park. Urban Studies. 2003. Vol. 40. № 4. Р. 707–732.

Ozcan Saritas. Foresight for science parks: The case of Ankara University. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262860755.

Shin D.H. An alternative approach to developing science parks: a case study from Korea. Papers in Regional Science. 2001. Vol. 80. № 1. Р. 103–111.

Tsai D.H.A. Knowledge spillovers and high technology clustering: evidence from Taiwans Hsinchu science based industrial park. Economic Policy. 2005. Vol. 23. № 1. Р. 116–128.

Verdini G. The Role of Geographical Proximity in the Establishment and Development of Science Park. Asian Geographer, 2015. Vol. 32. Р. 117–133.

Yang C.H. Are young technology based firms located on science parks really more innovative? Evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy. 2009. Vol. 38. № 1. Р. 77–85.

Yeoh C. Created enclaves for enterprise: an empirical study of Singapores industrial parks in Indonesia, Vietnam and China. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 2005. Vol. 17. № 6. Р. 479–499.

Published

2023-12-20

Issue

Section

АRCHITECTURE AND CONSTRUCTION