ADAPTATION AND PRESERVATION OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE: ISSUES OF EFFECTIVE UTILIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2023.27.6Keywords:
functional adaptation, cultural heritage, restoration, private initiative, public partnershipAbstract
The article discusses the importance of preserving historical environments, in particular, the connection between architectural landmarks and the urban setting. The value of monuments as an economic resource is noted, as well as the problems of the Great Restoration in Ukraine and the issue of adapting architectural landmarks to changes in their functional purpose. The article analyzes in detail the historical sequence of the development of the practice of adapting cultural heritage objects and describes the problems that have arisen at different times and their consequences. The modern mechanisms for preserving monuments at the legislative level are described in detail, and investment problems in the field of cultural heritage conservation are outlined. The article also draws attention to the problems of preserving cult buildings, provides examples of functional adaptation of these buildings that are architectural landmarks, describes different options for preservation, and provides examples of adaptation and changes in their function. Purpose – the article explores the important problem of preserving cultural heritage and proposes ways to solve it. Methodology. The methods of system-structural, comparative analysis, and the method of summarizing positive and negative experience in domestic and foreign practice were used. Results. The article provides examples of successful adaptation of architectural landmarks to changes in their functional purpose, which allows preserving the structures and using them in modern life. The authors of the article share their experience and recommendations for the preservation and restoration of architectural landmarks, in particular, they emphasize the importance of involving the public in the process of preserving cultural heritage and the need to increase citizens’ awareness of the value of architectural landmarks. In addition, the article provides examples of successful adaptation of architectural landmarks with a change in their functional purpose, allowing for the preservation of structures and their use in modern life. The authors of the article share their experience and recommendations for the preservation and restoration of architectural landmarks, including emphasizing the importance of involving the public in the process of preserving cultural heritage and the need to increase citizens’ awareness of the value of architectural landmarks. Therefore, the article is an important supplementary material for studying the issues of preserving cultural heritage and restoring architectural landmarks. The authors of the article analyzed various aspects of this problem, provided recommendations for improving the process of preserving and restoring cultural heritage, and also emphasized the importance of public support in solving this problem.
References
Akulenko V. (2013). Mizhnarodne pravo okhorony kulturnykh tsinnostei ta yoho implementatsiia u vnutrishnomu pravi Ukrainy [International law on the protection of cultural values and its implementation in the domestic law of Ukraine]. Kyiv : Yustinian. S. 616 [in Ukrainian].
Artishevskyi A. (2007). Deiaki aspekty zberezhennia i vykorystannia pamiatok starovyny. Suchasni problemy doslidzhennia, restavratsii ta zberezhennia kulturnoi spadshchyny [Some aspects of preservation and use of ancient monuments. Modern problems of research, restoration and preservation of cultural heritage] : Zb. nauk. pr. z mystetstvoznavstva, arkhitekturoznavstva y kulturolohii. Kyiv, Vyp. 4. S. 392–396 [in Ukrainian].
Bosenko Ye. (2019). Vyznachennia potentsialu adaptatsii znachnykh istorychnykh budivel, yak sposib zberezhennia arkhitekturnoi spadshchyny. [Determining the adaptation potential of significant historical buildings as a way of preserving architectural heritage] : dys. na zdobuttia stupenia kand. arkhitektury : spets. 18.00.01 “Teoriia arkhit., restavratsiia pamiatok arkhit”. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
DBN V.3.2-1-2004: Rekonstruktsiia, remont, restavratsiia obiektiv nevyrobnychoi sfery. Restavratsiini, konservatsiini ta remontni roboty na pamiatkakh kulturnoi spadshchyny [Reconstruction, repair, restoration of nonproduction facilities. Restoration, conservation and repair works at cultural heritage sites] : ofitsiine vydannia. K. : Derzhbud Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
Zakon Ukrainy “Pro okhoronu kulturnoi spadshchyny” [Tekst] [On the protection of cultural heritage]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 2000, № 39, S. 333.
Koval D. 2016. V imia mystetstva. Mizhnarodnopravovyi kontekstualnyi analiz zakhystu kulturnykh tsinnostei u zviazku iz zbroinym konfliktom [In the name of art. International legal contextual analysis of the protection of cultural values in connection with armed conflict]. Odesa : Feniks. S. 418 [in Ukrainian].
Kondel-Perminova N. (2008). Intehratsiia pamiatok arkhitektury ta mistobuduvannia v suchasnyi sotsiokulturnyi kontekst. Suchasni problemy doslidzhennia, restavratsii ta zberezhennia kulturnoi spadshchyny [Integration of monuments of architecture and urban planning in the modern socio-cultural context. Modern problems of research, restoration and preservation of cultural heritage] : Zb. nauk. pr. z mystetstvoznavstva, arkhitekturoznavstva y kulturolohii. Kyiv, Vyp. 5. S. 94–112 [in Ukrainian].
Kontseptsiia derzhavnoi polityky reformuvannia sfery okhorony [The concept of the state policy of reforming the field of monument protection]. URL: http://mincult.kmu.gov.ua/control/publish/article?art_id=245358162 [in Ukrainian].
Partyka R. (2014). Arkhitekturno-planuvalna rekonstruktsiia ta suchasne vykorystannia pamiatok arkhitektury [Architectural and planning reconstruction and modern use of architectural monuments]. Visnyk Lvivskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu, Vyp. 15. S. 173–177 [in Ukrainian].
Prybieha L. (2007). Do pytannia vyznachennia ta klasyfikatsii obiektiv arkhitekturno-mistobudivnoi spadshchyny [To the issue of definition and classification of objects of architectural and urban planning heritage]. Pratsi Naukovo-doslidnoho instytutu pamiatkookhoronnykh doslidzhen. Kyiv, Vyp. 3. S. 107–114 [in Ukrainian].
Pro okhoronu kulturnoi spadshchyny : Zakon Ukrainy vid 07.06.2000 r. [On the protection of cultural heritage : Law of Ukraine dated 06.07.2000]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. № 39. S. 333 [in Ukrainian].
Pro okhoronu nematerialnoi kulturnoi spadshchyny : Konventsiia vid 17.10.2003 [On the protection of intangible cultural heritage: Convention dated 17.10.20032008]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. № 16 [in Ukrainian].
Skibitska T. (2006). Vtraty avtentychnosti obiektiv kulturnoi spadshchyny vnaslidok rekonstruktsii, vykonanykh pid vyhliadom lehitymnykh restavratsii ta reabilitatsii (na prykladakh pamiatok arkhitektury Kyieva) [Loss of authenticity of objects of cultural heritage as a result of reconstructions carried out under the guise of legitimate restorations and rehabilitations (on the examples of architectural monuments of Kyiv)]. Pratsi Naukovo-doslidnoho instytutu pamiatkookhoronnykh doslidzhen. ArtEk. S. 165 [in Ukrainian].
Frenkel I. (2018). Kultura i kreatyvni industrii yak osnova rozumnoi stratehii rozvytku maloi terytorii [Culture and creative industries as the basis of a reasonable strategy for the development of a small area] : Navchalnyi posibnyk / I.V. Frenkel. Vinnytsia. S. 152 [in Ukrainian].
Cherkasova E. (2007). Formy adaptatsyy pamiatnykov arkhytektury k sovremennomu yspolzovanyiu [Forms of adaptation of monuments of architecture to modern use]. Naukovyi visnyk budivnytstva : Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Kharkiv, Vyp. 41. S. 22–30 [in Ukrainian].
71 naukovo-tekhnichna konferentsiia. Kharkiv, KhDTUBA, 15–17/03 2016 r.: Bosenko E.V. Analiz kharakterystyky tsinnoi istorychnoi zabudovy z metoiu vyiavlennia resursnoho potentsialu prystosuvannia do suchasnoho vykorystannia. [Analysis of the characteristics of a valuable historical building in order to identify the resource potential of adaptation to modern use] / vidp. za vyp. : d. t. n. prof. Honcharenko D.F. [in Ukrainian].
Bloszies C. (2012). Old Buildings, New Designs: Architectural Transformations. New York : Prinseton Architectural Press. S. 143 [in English].
Cullinane J. (2003). Maintaining and Repairing Old and Historic Buildings. Hoboken, New Jersey : John Wiley&Sons, Inc. S. 260 [in English].
Douglas J. (2006). Building Adaptation: Second Edition. Oxford : Butterworth-Heinemann. S. 651 [in English].
Macdonald Susan, Cheong Caroline. The Role of Public-Private Partnership and the Third Sector in Conservation of Heritage Buildings, Sites, and Historic Urban Areas. Research Report – The Getty Conservation Institute, LA. S. 32 [in English].
