Post-photography as post-philosophy: «photographic evangels»

Authors

  • М. С. Кириченко Київський національний університет імені Тараса Шевченка

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/2412-2157.30.14450

Keywords:

photography, post-photography, hyper-photography, digital-quantum photography, «recursive photo», reality, digitalization, post-philosophy

Abstract

Introduction. With the development of technologies, means of displaying and transmitting reality, photography loses its mission and from the position of a purely technical conceptualization of reality, shifts to the sphere of post-photography and, accordingly, post-philosophy for which photography becomes a source of philosophical meanings, interpretations, clarifications. Post-photography, which is characterized by constant manipulation and digitalization, makes us revise the phenomenon of «photography» which actually ceased to existing as a «referent», and acquired the signs of a «desirent», and thereby became an element in the structure of capitalism and consumerism. The aim and tasks are to find out the specific features of post-photography and the post-philosophical search for meaning in a photographic image. Research methods. The prerequisite for the analysis of philosophical discourses is the explication of their own logical circuits. Also, a comparative and a deconstruction methods are involved. Research results. It is worth noting that the development of technology is not the only reason why photography has become post-photography, and accordingly the subject of post-philosophical reflections. In a digital environment, photography mutates and transforms too intensely and requires constant rethinking. Discussion. Sources for determining the essence of post-photography are the works of such researchers as: S. Sontag, V. Flusser, R. Krauss, V. Savchuk and others. An important place among the discussions is occupied by the study of F. Ritchin, since he sees post-photography as a source of modern types of photography, namely hyper-photography and quasi-photography. Conclusion. In a digital environment, photography mutates and transforms too intensely. Post-photography is anything but a tool for technical reproduction. Today, post-photography is a powerful tool of capitalism.

Author Biography

М. С. Кириченко, Київський національний університет імені Тараса Шевченка

доцент кафедри історії філософії

References

Беньямин В. Краткая история фотографии / В. Беньямин // Произведение искусства в эпоху его технической воспроизводимости. Избранные эссе. – М.: Медиум, 1996. – С. 66-91.

Бурдье П., Болтански Л., Кастель Р., Шамборедон Ж.-К. Общедоступное искусство. Опыт о социальном использовании фотографии // Un art moyen: Essai sur les usages sociaux de la photographie. – М.: Праксис, 2014. – 446 с.

Жижек С. Киногид извращенца: Идеология / The Pervert's Guide to Ideology (2012) / [Електронний ресурс] / С. Жижек. – Режим доступу: https:// www. youtube. com/watch?v=8nArWT351dY

Руйе А. Фотография: между документом и современным искусством / [Електронний ресурс] / А. Руйе. – Режим доступу: http://www.klex.ru/mn

Савчук В. Философия фотографии. – СПб. : Изд-во СПб. Ун-та, 2005. – 256 с.

Слотердайк П. Правила человеческого зоопарка. Ответ на письмо Хайдеггера о гуманизме. / [Електронний ресурс] / П. Слотердайк. – Режим доступу: http://elib.org.ua/philosophy/ua_show_archives.php?subaction=showfull&id=1108550639&archive=0211&start_from=&ucat=1&

Зонтаг С. О фотографии. – М.: ООО «Ад Маргинем Пресс», 2013. – 272 с.

Флюссер В. За философию фотографии; [пер. с нем. Г. Хайдаровой]. – СПб.: Изд-во С.Петерб. ун-та, 2008. – 146 с.

Carpenter J. «They Live» (1988) / [Електронний ресурс] / Дж. Карпентер. – Режим доступу: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096256/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

Krauss R. Le Photodraphique Pour une Theorie des Ecarts. – Р., 2014. – 304 р.

Ritchin F. After Photography. – NY:W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2010. – 264 р.

Published

2019-12-01

Issue

Section

Cultural Studies