RISK DEFINITION IN CIVIL UNMANNED AVIATION

Authors

  • Volodymyr Kharchenko National Aviation University
  • Denys Мatiychyk National Aviation University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/2306-1472.69.11049

Keywords:

air transport system, factors of aviation accidents, risks in civil aviation, unmanned aerial vehicle

Abstract

Objective: The risks in unmanned civil aviation are considered as one of the most important. In the article is proved applicability of ensuring the flight safety of aircraft and considered the basic risks of manned civil aviation. Methods: Analyzed statistical data on aviation accidents, organized probabilities distribution of aviation accidents for manned and unmanned civil aviation to identify factors that influence the occurrence of emergency situations in manned and unmanned aviation. Results: We proposed typology of risk components in civil aviation and systematized methods and techniques to reduce risks. Over the analogies defined possible risks, their causes and remedies in civil unmanned aircraft. Weight coefficients distribution was justified between risk types for development of recommendations on risk management in unmanned civil aviation. Discussion: We found that the most probable risk in manned civil aviation is the human factor, organization of air traffic control, design flaws of unmanned aviation system as a whole, as well as maintenance of unmanned aviation system.

Author Biographies

Volodymyr Kharchenko, National Aviation University

Doctor of Engineering. Professor.

Vice-Rector on Scientific Work of the National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Editor-in-Chief of the scientific journal Proceedings of the National Aviation University.

Winner of the State Prize of Ukraine in Science and Technology, Honored Worker of Science and Technology of Ukraine.

Education: Kyiv Institute of Civil Aviation Engineers, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Research area: management of complex socio-technical systems, air navigation systems and automatic decision-making systems aimed at avoidance conflict situations, space information technology design, air navigation services in Ukraine provided by СNS/АТМ systems.

Denys Мatiychyk, National Aviation University

Postgraduate student of Department of Air Navigation Systems, National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Education: National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine (2012).

Research area: Unmanned Aerial Systems.

References

PAS. Remotely piloted aircraft systems. The Global perspective. 2012/2013.10th Edition. June 2012, Bluenburgh & CO. Available at: http://uvs-info.com/index.php/ (accessed 23.10.2016)

Cole, C. Large military drones continue to crash as they spread. Drone Wars UK. Available at: https://dronewars.net/ (accessed 10.10.2016)

Yaremchuk N.V., Surkov M.S. (2005) Ekonomicheskoe razvitie sovremennoy Rossii [Economic development of modern Russia]. monograph (edited by Yaremchuka N. V.), Premyera Publ., pp.150-161. (In Russian)

Jonathan, D., Stevenson, J.D., Young, S.O.,

Rolland L., Estimated levels of safety for small unmanned aerial vehicles and risk mitigation strategies. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems, 2015, Vol. 3, No.4: pp. 205-221.

Risk Management Handbook. Federal Aviation Administration. 2009. P. 113. Available at: http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/aviation/ (accessed 20.10.2016)

Smurov М. Yu. Bezopasnost poletov vozdushnykh sudov grazhdanskoy aviacyi s uchetom riskov vozniknveniya negativnykh sobytiy [Flight safety of CA aircraft with regard to aviation risks]. Тransport of Russian Federation. (In Russian) Available at: http://www.rostransport.com/themes/7500/?sphrase_id=14281 (accessed 10.06.2016)

Thompson S., Bracken-Roche C. Understanding public opinion of UAVs in Canada: A 2014 analysis of survey data and its policy implications. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems, 2015, Vol. 3, No.4: pp. 156-175.

Кolisnyk А.А. (2010) Analiz rivnya bezpeky polotiv ta vyyavlennya potenciynykh faktoriv avariynosti z cyvilnymy povitryanymy sudnamy Ukrainy u 1-omy pivrichchi 2010 roku [Analysis of aviation safety and revealing potential factors of accidents for Ukrainian CA aircraft in the 1st half 2010]. Kyiv. (In Ukrainian) Available at: http://avia.gov.ua/documents/arhiv_sajtu/23352.html (accessed 15.10.2016)

Onyschenko V.Ya. (1995) Clasifikaciya i sravnitelnyi analiz riskov. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlenosti [Classification and comparative risk assessment, Occupational safety in industry]. №7. P.23-27.

Lapin V.L., Ryzhkov F.N., Popov V.M., Toma¬kov V.I. (1995) Bezopasnoe vzaimodeystviye cheloveka s tekhnicheskemi sistemami [Safe interaction of human with technical systems], Kursk,. 238 p. (In Russian)

Alymov V.T., Tarasova N.P. (2006) Tekhnogennyi risk. Analiz i ocenka [Man-made risks. Analysis and evaluation]. М.: Akademknyga Publ,. 118 p. (In Russian)

Schnell T., Engler J., Entropic skill assessment of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) operators. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems, 2014, Vol. 02, No. 02 : pp. 53-68.

Published

2016-12-21

How to Cite

Kharchenko, V., & Мatiychyk D. (2016). RISK DEFINITION IN CIVIL UNMANNED AVIATION. Proceedings of the National Aviation University, 69(4), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.18372/2306-1472.69.11049

Issue

Section

AEROSPACE SYSTEMS FOR MONITORING AND CONTROL

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >>