CONCEPT OF THE OTHER AND ITS PLACE IN THE GAME STRUCTURE

Abstract

In the introduction, authors considered game as a category which can represent other phenomenon of the human being as love, labour, death etc. And this characteristic of representation exemplify dialogical nature of the phenomenon of the game. This, in turn, creates the possibility of the existence of Other in the game structure. The aim of the article is the analysis of the problem field of the game phenomenon, its basic aspects. For this purpose main works about the game theory of such authors as J. Huizinga, E. Fink, R. Caillos, H. Gadamer, as well as Ukrainian researchers of this problem field, for example: K. Sigov, N. Yarovitskaya, L. Naumova and others are analysed. The tasks of this article consist in demonstration of the inclusive nature of Other in the game structure. For thispurpose historical, comparative and interpretive research methods have been applied to. Within research results authors considered game as a medial category. Based on main researches about concept of intertextuality of such authors as R. Barthes and Ju. Kristeva authors of this paper showed intertextuality relation between game and the real being. Also the main characteristics of the game chronotope are set. Discussion analyses main scientific researches which are devoted to issues of the Other of, such authors as E. Levinas, E. Husserl and M. Bakhtin. The discussion character of the concepts of these authors is revealed. In the context of this scientific research, the position of the Other in the game structure is demonstrated. As a result, basic definitions of the game subject have been indicated. In conclusion the importance of the inclusion principle for intersubjectivity connection with the Other and formation the unity between Other and Self are shown. Such unity makes possible to recognize and represent values of the real (objective) world.