POSSIBILITY OF PHILOSOPHICAL METHODOLOGY APPLYING FOR INTERPRETATION OF “RESPECT” CONCEPT IN THE LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2412-2157.29.14063Keywords:
respect, Baconian method, Cartesian method, moral in law, GDPR, respect for human rights and fundamental freedomsAbstract
Contemporary investigations that are closely connected to the sphere of human rights have expanded the boundaries of law theory and stated its close connection to the moral sphere. The examples of such investigations are represented in the introduction. Starting from the second part of the XXth century, they were becoming more and more popular all over the world. This progress has shown many terminological issues related to the moral notions that should be solved as soon as possible with the help of cross-disciplinary studies. Hence the main aim and task of the article are to demonstrate the way to identify and solve such issues with the help of philosophical methodology on the example of the General Data Protection Regulation. For this purpose, Baconian and Cartesian research methods are used in conjunction with R. Dworkin terminological approach with the help of conceptual-categorical analysis, comparative analysis, and hermeneutic method. On the basis of the study and analysis of the Baconian and Cartesian methodologies and with help of R. Dworkin economic terminological approach, the author of the article within research results demonstrates the process of identifying of problematic notions in a legal text, its analysis in the context of the legal area, and, as a result, the formulation of contextual (situational) interpretation of concepts of this kind. The discussion reviews the state of affairs within contemporary social studies on respect from the points of view of the history of philosophy, political theory and philosophy of law. The emphasis is made on contemporary European and American studies, such as conference and essays provided by different scholars, Ph.D. students, and postgraduate students. The conclusions prove that we can and should measure moral notions in law sphere because of their important role in the lawmaking process. The author emphasizes that we can create an adequate contextual (situational) interpretation of vague notions, especially moral notions with the help of philosophical methodology.References
Альчук М. П. Філософсько-правовий вимір гідності людини / М. П. Альчук // СОФІЯ. Гуманітарнорелігієзнавчий вісник. – № 2 (2). – 2014. – C. 47-49.
Артюшенко О. Гідність як цінність буття сучасного українського суспільства / О. Артюшенко // Вісник Львівського університету. Серія філос.-політолог. студії. Випуск 10. – 2017. – С. 7-11.
Грищук О. В. Людська гідність / О. В. Грищук // Велика українська юридична енциклопедія: у 20 т., Т. 2. – Х.: Право, 2017. – С.143-148.
Зимовець Р. Повага VS Солідарність: Ліберальна та комунітаристська стратегії обґрунтування прав людини / Р. Зимовець // Філософська думка, 2014. – № 4. – С. 51-66.
Троїцька Т. С. Цілісність людини у трансдисциплінарному синтезі: спроба філософської кристалізації / Т. С. Троїцька, Г. Г. Тараненко // Актуальні проблеми філософії та соціології, Одеса. – Вип. 15. – 2017. – С. 139-141.
Bacon Francis The New Organon / F. Bacon. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/bacon1620.pdf
Bratu C. The Source of Moral Motivation and Actions We Owe to Others: Kant’s Theory of Respect / C. Bratu // Roots of Respect / Edited by Giovanni Giorgini and Elena Irrera. – Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, 2017. – P.131-148.
Descartes R. Discourse on the Method / R. Descartes. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу:
https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/descartes1637.pdf
Dillon R. S. Respect (First published Wed Sep 10, 2003; substantive revision Sun Feb 18, 2018) / R. S. Dillon // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [Електронний ресурс].
Режим доступу:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/respect/#KinRes.
Dworkin R. Taking Rights Seriously / R. Dworkin. Harvard University Press, 1978. – 377 p.
General Data Protection Regulation. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: https://publications. europa. eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3e485e15-11bd-11e6-ba9a01aa75ed71a1/language-en
Giorgini G. The Notion of Respect in Ancient Greek Poetry / G. Giorgini // Roots of Respect / Edited by Giovanni Giorgini and Elena Irrera. – Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, 2017. – P. 41-65.
Göbel M. Respect as the Foundation of Human Rights: To What Extent Can This View Be Attributed to Kant? / M. Göbel // Roots of Respect / Edited by Giovanni Giorgini and Elena Irrera. – Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, 2017. – P. 149-168.
Irrera E. Human Interaction in the State of Nature: Hobbes on Respect for Persons and Self-Respect / E. Irrera // Roots of Respect / Edited by Giovanni Giorgini and Elena Irrera. – Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, 2017. – P. 109-129.
Laitinen A. Hegel and Respect for Persons / A. Laitinen // Roots of Respect / Edited by Giovanni Giorgini and Elena Irrera. – Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, 2017. – P. 171-186.
Loizides A. John Stuart Mill: Individuality, Dignity, and Respect for Persons / A. Loizides // Roots of Respect / Edited by Giovanni Giorgini and Elena Irrera. — Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, 2017. – P. 187-206.
Knoll M. The Cardinal Role of Respect and SelfRespect for Rawls’s and Walzer’s Theories of Justice / M. Knoll // Roots of Respect / Edited by Giovanni Giorgini and Elena Irrera. – Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, 2017. – P. 207-224.
Rowe C. J. Plato on Respect, and What “Belongs to” Oneself / C. J. Rowe // Roots of Respect / Edited by Giovanni Giorgini and Elena Irrera. – Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, 2017. – P. 67-82.
Weber S. Aristotle and Respect for Persons / S. Weber // Roots of Respect / Edited by Giovanni Giorgini and Elena Irrera. – Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, 2017. – P. 83-105.
