WEBSITE REGULATORY LAWS OF THE USA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.52.13961Keywords:
website, Internet regulation, Internet governance, Copyright Law, Digital Millennium Act, protection of the rights of the website ownerAbstract
Purpose: the provisions and features of US law in relation to the regulation of websites and to suggest provisions useful for incorporation into Ukrainian legislation in the field of Internet regulation. The methodological basis of the research comprises philosophical, ideological, general scientific and special methods. Results: the American legislation in the field of regulation of copyright protection relations in general on the Internet and on websites in particular was shown as one of the most successful. Also the author found out that there a lot of blanks as to this issue in Ukrainian legislation. The author suggested for the lawmaker of our state to adopt the experience of American colleagues in regulating the legal relations related to electronic resources. Discussion: improvement of the national legislation in the sphere of Internet regulation on the example of acts of the USA; search for actions to be taken while dealing with the website regulation.
References
An Act for the general revision of the Copyright Law, title 17 of the United States Code, and for other purposes, 1976. (Pub. L. 94-553).133.
Власенко А. В. Охрана объектов авторского права в сети Интернет в зарубежных странах и в Российской Федерации. Экономика и право. XXI век. 2011. № 1. URL: www.economy.law-books.ru/1-11/1-11-5.doc (дата звернення: 27.08.2019).
Case No. 89-1909: Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service 499 US 340. URL: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/499/340/case.html.39. The Digital Мillennium Copyright Act of 1998. U.S. Copyright Office Summary. Washington: U.S. Copyright Office, 1998. P. 10-18 (дата звернення: 27.08.2019).
The Digital Мillennium Copyright Act of 1998. U.S. Copyright Office Summary. Washington: U.S. Copyright Office, 1998. P. 10-18.
Закон США «Об авторском праве в цифровую эпоху» / Google Inc. 2008. URL: https://support.google.com/legal/answer/1120734 (дата звернення: 27.08.2019).
Case No. C 03-04913 JF: Online Policy Group, Nelson Chu Pavlosky, and Luke Thomas Smith v. Diebold, Incorporated, and Diebold Election Systems, Incorporated/ URL: https://www.eff.org/ files/filenode/OPG_v_Diebold/ 20040930_ diebold_ sj_order.pdf (дата звернення: 27.08.2019).
Щеголев И. Мыльная опера про виртуальных пиратов. Частный корреспондент. 2011. URL: http://www.chaskor.ru/article/mylnaya_opera_ pro_virtualnyh_piratov_26178 (дата звернення: 27.08.2019).
H.R.3261- Stop Online Piracy Act / The Library of Congress. 2011. URL: http://thomas.loc. gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.3261 (дата звернення: 27.08.2019).
Sasso B. Sen. Wyden pushes anti-piracy alternative / Capitol Hill Publishing Corp. 2011. URL: http://thehill.com/policy/technology/ 200313-sen-wyden-pushes-anti-piracy-alternative (дата звернення: 27.08.2019).
Samuels J. An Alternative to SOPA: An Open Process Befitting an Open Internet / Elec-tronic Frontier Foundation. 2011. URL: https://www.eff.org/ru/ deeplinks/2011/12/ alternative-sopa-open-process-befitting-open-internet (дата звернення: 27.08.2019).
References
An Act for the general revision of the Copyright Law, title 17 of the United States Code, and for other purposes, 1976. (Pub. L. 94-553).133.
Vlasenko A. V. Ohrana ob’ektov avtorskogo prava v seti Internet v zarubezhnyh stranah i v Rossijskoj Federacii. Jekonomika i pravo. XXI vek. 2011. № 1. URL: www.economy.law-books.ru/1-11/1-11-5.doc (data zvernennja: 27.08.2019).
Case No. 89-1909: Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service 499 US 340. URL: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/499/340/case.html.39. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. U.S. Copyright Office Summary. Washington: U.S. Copyright Office, 1998. P. 10-18 (data zvernennja: 27.08.2019).
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. U.S. Copyright Office Summary. Washington: U.S. Copyright Office, 1998. P. 10-18.
Zakon SShA «Ob avtorskom prave v cifrovuju jepohu» / Google Inc. 2008. URL: https://support. google.com/legal/answer/1120734 (data zvernennja: 27.08.2019).
Case No. C 03-04913 JF: Online Policy Group, Nelson Chu Pavlosky, and Luke Thomas Smith v. Diebold, Incorporated, and Diebold Election Systems, Incorporated/ URL: https://www.eff.org/files/ file-node/OPG_v_Diebold/20040930_diebold_sj_ order.pdf (data zvernennja: 27.08.2019).
Shhegolev I. Myl’naja opera pro virtual’nyh piratov. Chastnyj korrespondent. 2011. URL: http://www.chaskor.ru/article/mylnaya_opera_pro_virtualnyh_ piratov_ 26178 (data zvernennja: 27.08.2019).
H.R.3261- Stop Online Piracy Act / The Library of Congress. 2011. URL: http://thomas.loc. gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.3261 (data zvernennja: 27.08.2019).
Sasso B. Sen. Wyden pushes anti-piracy alternative / Capitol Hill Publishing Corp. 2011. URL: http://thehill.com/policy/technology/200313-sen-wyden-pushes-anti-piracy-alternative (data zvernennja: 27.08.2019).
Samuels J. An Alternative to SOPA: An Open Process Befitting an Open Internet / Electronic Frontier Foundation. 2011. URL: https://www.eff.org/ru/ deeplinks/2011/12/alternative-sopa-open-process-befitting-open-internet (data zvernennja: 27.08.2019).
