IDENTIFICATION OF ANIMAL-VEHICLE COLLISIONS HOTSPOTS ON HIGHWAY М-18
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2306-1472.64.9020Keywords:
animal-vehicle collisions, identification of hotspots, model location, monitoring systemAbstract
In the article we evaluate the deviation between actual location of the animal-vehicle collision and its models which were rounded up to a certain numbers. The authors use three methods: a.) graphical analysis comparing the values models location on the single coordinate plane; b.) the comparison of their absolute and relative error; c.) the comparison of the class frequency for the values of the models locations.References
Jensen R. R. Landscape factors that contribute to animal–vehicle collisions in two northern Utah canyons/ Ryan R. Jensen, Rusty A. Gonser, Christian Joyner// Applied Geography. – 2014. – #6. – P. 74–79.
Wildlife-vehicle collision reduction study. Report to Congress. U.S. Department of Transportation/ M. P. Huijser [et al.] – Washington: Federal Highway Administration, 2007. – 254 p.
Rodríguez-Morales B. Spatiotemporal analysis of vehicle collisions involving wild boar and roe deer in NW Spain/ Beatriz Rodríguez-Morales, Emilio Rafael Díaz-Varela, Manuel
Francisco Marey-Pérez //Accident Analysis & Prevention. – 2013. – #60. – P. 121–133.
Assessing methods of mitigating wildlife–vehicle collisions by accident characterization and spatial analysis/ Emilio R. Diaz-Varela, [et al.] // Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. – 2011. – #16 (4). – P. 281–287.
Snow P. N. Underreporting of wildlife-vehicle collisions does not hinder predictive models for large ungulates/ Nathan P. Snow, [et al.] // Biological Conservation. – 2015. – #181. – , P. 44–
Tegge R.A. Correcting erroneous crash locations in transportation safety analysis / R.A.Tegge, Y. Ouyang // Accident Analysis and Prevention. – 2008. – #41(1). – P. 202– 209.
Montella A. A comparative analysis of hotspot identification methods/ Accident Analysis & Prevention. – 2010. – #42 (2). P. 571–581.
Miranda-Moreno L. F. Bayesian multiple testing procedures for hotspot identification / Luis F. Miranda-Moreno, Aurélie Labbe, Liping Fu// Accident Analysis & Prevention. – 2007. – #39 (6). –
P. 1192–1201.
Animal-Vehicle Collision Data Collection Throughout the United States and Canada”. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation/ M.Huijser, [et al.]. –
Raleigh:Center for Transportation and the Environment., 2007. – 391 p.
California’s Integrated Approach to Collaborative Conservation in Transportation Planning. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation/ G.
Erickson. – Raleigh:Center for Transportation and the Environment., – 2007. – 257 p.
Lord D. The statistical analysis of crashfrequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives/ Dominique Lord, Fred Mannering//Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practic. – 2010. – # 44(5). – P. 291–305.
Mannering F. L. Analytic methods in accident research: Methodological frontier and future directions/ Fred L. Mannering, Chandra R. Bhat// Analytic Methods in Accident Research. –
– #1. – P. 1–22.
Gunson K.E. Large animal-vehicle collisions in the Central Canadian Rocky Mountains: patterns and characteristics. IN: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation/ K.E. Gunson, B. Chruszcz and A.P. Clevenger. – Raleigh: Center for Transportation and the Environment, 2004. –366 p.
