• Oleksandr Luppo National Aviation University
  • Gennadiy Argunov National Aviation University
  • Andrii Mohyla National Aviation University



advanced flexible use of airspace, allocation, cooperation, efficiency


Purpose: Concept of Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) allows to eliminate many problems on the basis of civil-military coordination, but there are still a lot of areas for improvement. These improvements will be implemented in the Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace (AFUA) concept. Methods: We examine the airspace structure in the frames of AFUA concept, which includes variable profile areas, temporary reserved and temporary segregated areas, danger or restricted areas. Mission Trajectory in AFUA which allows designing ad-hoc structures delineation at short notice is also examined. Regarding the performance enhancements of AFUA we compare these with FUA concept. Examination of AFUA structure gives us better view of the functions and opportunities of this concept. Result: AFUA concept provides many advantages for the civil aviation stakeholders and includes many other positive sides. Variable Profile Areas provide more flexibility, particularly in a high density traffic area and any combination of basic volume possible. Collaborative decision-making will increase the situational awareness of both parties and help to decrease the transit between airbases and training areas, allows military to use larger airspaces for missions on an absolute time-limited basis. As a result of mission trajectory implementation in AFUA concept general air traffic crossing are possible in all type of airspace structures, after coordination or under specific permanent agreements. The use of Centralized AFUA Services will allow the central collection, integration and provision of ASM data in support of continuous collaborative network processes, in such a way improving operational performance during the planning and execution phases (predictability, flexibility, better use of capacity, enhanced flight efficiency, real time sharing of information, better management of available airspace). Discussion: Given the important contribution that AFUA brings into air traffic management system, its main architectural components and performance enhancements, collaborative decision making process and concept’s implementation phases.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Luppo, National Aviation University

Candidate of Pedagogic Sciences. Associate Professor.

National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Education: Academy of Civil Aviation, Leningrad, USSR (1982).

Research area: air traffic management enhancement, human factor investigation, methods for ATCOs’ professional skills improvement.

Gennadiy Argunov, National Aviation University

Associate Professor.

National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Education: State Flight Academy of Ukraine, Kirovograd, Ukraine (1994).

Research area: prediction and elimination of potential conflict situations in the process of air traffic control.

Andrii Mohyla, National Aviation University


National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Research area: air traffic management enhancement.


EUROCONTROL Civil/Military Interface Standing Committee, Determining Future Military Airspace Requirements in Europe, Brussels, Belgium, 2003.

Kettunen T., Hustache J.-C., Fuller I., Howell D., Bonn J., Knorr D.: Flight efficiency studies in Europe and the United States. USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, 2005.

Mihetec T.; Odić D.; Steiner S. Evaluation of Night Route Network on Flight Efficiency in Europe. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering. Volume 1(2011), 3; p. 132-141.

Luppo A., Hlushko O., Dolmatova D. Analysis of air traffic and forecast of its growth in European region. Proceedings of the National Aviation University. 2013, N 1 (54), p. 37–43.

Skorupski J.: Measuring of controlled air traffic safety. Archives of Transport, 2007, Vol. 19, p. 177-191.

Versteegt H.H., Visser H.G. Traffic complexity based conflict resolution. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 2003, no. 11(2), p.103-122.

Durand N., Alliot J.-M. Ant Colony Optimization for Air Traffic Conflict Resolution. Eighth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM 2009).

Idris H. Delahaye D. Distributed Trajectory Flexibility Preservation for Traffic Complexity Mitigation, Eighth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2150/2005 of 23 December 2005

Mihetec T., Steiner S., Odić D. Utilization of Flexible Airspace Structure in Flight Efficiency Optimization Traffic&Transportation. 2013, Vol. 25, No. 2, p. 109-118

International conference of scientific paper AFASES 2011 Brasov, 26-28 May 2011 The concept of Flexible use of airspace. Constantin BUJOR p. 1071-1074

EUROCONTROL – SESAR Concept of Operations Step 1. Edition: 01.00.00. Date: 09.05.2012.

EUROCONTROL - The Centralised Services – Information Session. CS#4 – ADVANCED FLEXIBLE USE OF AIRSPACE.


EUROCONTROL - Advance Flexible Use of Airspace.P.DELMOUZEE. Date: 05th March 2014

EUROCONTROL - The Network Manager tasks and the ASM improvement initiative. AFUAS Workshop. Date: 24th June 2015

EUROCONTROL –The ATM target concept DLM-0612-001-02-00a - September 2007.

EUROCONTROL - Advance Flexible Use of Airspace Service (AFUAS) – CS4. Date: 11 March 2015, World ATM Congress.



How to Cite

Luppo, O., Argunov, G., & Mohyla, A. (2016). CONCEPT OF ADVANCED FLEXIBLE USE OF AIRSPACE. Proceedings of National Aviation University, 67(2), 22–28.




Most read articles by the same author(s)