INFLUENCE OF CULTURAL FACTORS ON AIRMEN’S PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY IN MULTICULTURAL COMPANIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2411-264X.9.12417Keywords:
airmen, cultural influencing factors, professional activity, professional training, corporate cultureAbstract
The article is an investigation into miscommunications between air traffic controllers and pilots. Miscommunications may broadly be applied to a range of verbal communications problems ranging from misunderstandings, such as those due to ambiguity, language structure, to more technical problems. The author stresses that those misunderstandings may be due to cultural differences. Studies indicate that miscommunication is a pervasive problem in air traffic control and, although infrequent when considered as a percentage of daily transactions, nevertheless, has been a causal factor in numerous fatal accidentsReferences
Adhikari Dev Raj (2005). National Factors and Employment Ralations in Japan. Central department of management Tribhuvan University, Japan institute of labour policy and training, Tokyo. – 183 p.
C. Drury, J. Ma, C. Marin. Language Error in Aviation Maintenance, Final Report, University of Buffalo, the State university of New York. August 2005. – 109 p.
«Line Up and wait» in preparation for take off. FAA Safety briefing July, August 2010, Your source for general aviation news and information, Federal Aviation Administration, 2010. –3 p.
D. McMillan. Miscommunications in Air Traffic Control. School of Learning and Development, Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology. – October 1998. – 61 р.
Manual on the Prevention of Runway Incursions. Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority First Edition, International Civil Aviation Organization, 2007. – 90 р.
O. Prinzo, A. Hendrix, R. Hendrix. Pilot English Language Proficiency and the Prevalence of Communication Problems at Five U.S. Air Route Traffic Control Centers. Final Report. Office of Aerospace Medicine, Washington, DC 20591Federal Aviation Administration, 2008. – 37 р.
O. Veronika Prinzo Audrey C. Thompson The ICAO English Language Proficiency Rating Scale Applied to En route Voice Communications of U.S. and Foreign Pilots Final Report Office of Aerospace Medicine Washington, DC 20591, 2009. – 20 р.
Runway safety corner: English language proficiency // FAA aviation news. Aviation safety from cover to cover. Volume 41, number 3, 2002. – P. 15–17.
B. Ritter. (2006). Can business ethics be trained/ A study of the ethical decision making process in business students. Journal of business ethic. – Р. 153–164.
Sookon Kim. Is the Japanese system of life employment applicable to a developing country such as Krea/ The 6th World congress of the International industrial relations association in Tokyo, Japan,. Korea development institute, Seol, Korea. – 1983. – 30 p.
A. Schultz; М.Huglen, D.Lim, English Education and Communication Studies: Ambiguity in the International Airway. U.S. Department of education, Educational resources information center, 2001. – 15 p.
