Content of the public administration (theoretical and legal aspect)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.34.8169Keywords:
public administration, executive power, subjects of administration, objects of administration, forms of administration, methods of administration, purposes of administrationAbstract
The article is about the problems of determination of the state administration in the political system of the state. Its «narrow» and «broad» concepts are in the base of its determination. The author also pays attention to the administration systems, forms and methods as important and necessary values in scientific analysis of public administration.The relevance and insufficient study of these problems led to the necessity of writing this article. The author’s position concerning certain debatable issues of public administration problems are revealed in it.
It is pointed out in the article that administrative reform implementation in Ukraine and also its tasks were the reasons for the scientific grounding of the number of basic categories that compose a content of this process. The purpose of the administrative reform is determined through its content and means: 1) gradual establishment of such a system of governance that will ensure formation of Ukraine as a lawful, civilized European state with high living standards, social stability, culture and democracy, will allow it to become a significant factor in the world and in Europe in particular; 2) the formation of the public administration system that would be close to the needs and demands of people, remain under control of the nation, be clear, effective, built on the scientific principles and the main priority of its activity would be to serve people, national interests.
The author concludes that analysis of the correlation between the forms and methods of public administration allows to state that: a) each form has a peculiar use of specific methods; b) for each form it is common to have a specific model of correlation of different methods, which is an indicator in determining the type of political regime with which we deal in each case; c) the use of certain methods is always performed not only by certain state authorities but also by public administration in general.
References
Тацій В. Українська держава і право на по-чатку XXI століття / В. Тацій // Право України. – 2010. – № 1. – С. 6-14.
Нижник Н., Мосов С. Про співвідношення державного управління і виконавчої влади / Н. Нижник, С. Мосов // Вісник УАДУ. – 2000. – № 4. – С. 23-29.
Козлов Ю. М. Советское административное право / Ю. М. Козлов. – М.: Знание, 1984. – 208 с.
Тихомиров Ю. А. Курс административного права и процесса / Ю. А. Тихомиров. – М.: Юри-нформцентр, 1998. – 798 с.
Колпаков В. К. Адміністративне право України / В. К. Колпаков. – К: Юрінком Інтер, 1999. – 736 с.
Данилькевич Н. И. Административное право Украины / Н. И. Данилькевич. – Днепропетровск: ДНУ, 2001. – 168 с.
Чиркин В. Е. Государственное управление / В. Е. Чиркин. – М.: Юристъ, 2002. – 320 с.
Авер’янов В. Б. Питання адміністративної реформи у змісті загальної концепції державно-правової реформи / В. Б. Авер’янов // Державно-правова реформа в Україні. Матеріали науково-практичної конференції. – К.: Інститут законо-давства ВРУ, 1997. – С. 193-196.
Политология. Наука о политике / Под ред. В. П. Андрущенко, Н. И. Горлача. – Х.: ХГПУ, 1999. – 672 с.
Нижник Н., Мосов С. Про співвідношення державного управління і виконавчої влади / Н. Нижник, С. Мосов // Вісник УАДУ. – 2000. – № 4. – С. 23-29.
