CERTAIN ASPECTS OF TRADEMARK RIGHTS PROTECTION FOR GOODS AND SERVICES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.69.18355Keywords:
trademark, signs for goods and services, industrial design, protection of intellectual property rights, methods of protection of rightsAbstract
Purpose: to identify, on the basis of judicial practice, relevant categories of disputes related to the protection of rights to signs for goods and services. Formulation of recommendations aimed at improving the judicial protection of trademark rights. Research methods: formal-legal, system-functional, analysis and synthesis, modeling. Results: the main criterion characteristics of a trademark, important for the protection of intellectual property rights to it, are outlined. It has been established that judicial protection of trademark rights for goods and services is the most expedient and effective. It has been found that for a positive resolution of litigation in cases of protection of trademark rights, it is necessary to correctly choose and justify the methods of protection, to provide the court with sufficient and convincing evidence of infringement of intellectual property rights, to apply the conclusions and approaches to the resolution of trademark cases formed by the Supreme Court. Discussion: problems that arise in the protection of rights to signs for goods and services; methods of protecting intellectual property rights to signs for goods and services, defined by law or contract; opportunities to protect rights to a well-known trademark; competition of trademark and industrial design rights and its impact on the protection of intellectual property rights.
An important component of the effective protection of trademark rights is a proper understanding by the owners of their rights and the possibilities they have in the event of an infringement committed against them.
Of key importance is the correct choice of adequate methods of protecting trademark rights, their justification, submission to the court of appropriate, admissible, reliable and credible evidence: compliance of the trademark with the criteria of legal protection, independent use of this object of intellectual property, violation of the rights to the trademark by another person (individuals), consumer perceptions of the trademark and its perception, etc.
References
Assize of Bread and Ale: веб-сайт. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assize_of_Bread_and_Ale (дата звернення 28.10.2023).
Trademarks. URL: https://www.wipo.int/ trademarks/en/ (дата звернення 28.10.2023).
Про охорону прав на знаки для товарів і послуг: Закон України від 15 груд. 1993 р. № 3689-XII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/3689-12#Text.
Цивільний кодекс України: Закон України від 16 січ. 2003 р. № 435-IV. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text.
Kokhanovskaya O.V. Theoretical Problems of Information Relations in Civil Law: monograph. Kyiv: Publishing and printing center «Kiev University», 2006. 463 p.
Господарський процесуальний кодекс України від 06 лист. 1991 р. № 1798-ХІІ. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-12#Text.
Постанова КГС ВС від 13.08.2019 у справі № 910/6920/17. URL: https://zakononline. com.ua/ court-decisions/show/81844993.
Постанова КГС ВС від 15.07.2019 у справі № 910/18587/16. URL: https://verdictum. ligazakon.net/document/83059424.
Постанова КГС ВС від 28.05.2020 у справі № 910/13119/17. URL: https://verdictum. ligazakon.net/document/89595203.
Постанова КГС ВС від 06.04.2023 у справі № 910/5815/21. URL: https:// reyestr.court. gov.ua/Review/110107005.
Рішення господарського суду м. Києва від 29.06.2022 у справі № 910/11790/21. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105178244.
Рішення господарського суду м. Києва від 07.08.2019 у справі № 910/16373/18. URL: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/ show/83566608.
Schechter F.I. The Rational basis of trademark protection. Harvard law review. № 6. P. 813–833 (дата звернення 28.10.2023).
Рішення господарського суду м. Києва від 14.06.2021 у справі № 910/3051/20. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/97999021#
References
Assize of Bread and Ale: veb-sait. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assize_of_Bread_and_Ale (data zvernennia 28.10.2023).
Trademarks. URL: https://www.wipo.int/ trademarks/en/ (data zvernennia 28.10.2023).
Pro okhoronu prav na znaky dlia tovariv i posluh: Zakon Ukrainy vid 15 hrud. 1993 roku № 3689-XII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/3689-12#Text.
Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 16 sich. 2003 roku № 435-IV. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text.
Kokhanovskaya O.V. Theoretical Problems of Information Relations in Civil Law: monograph. Kyiv: Publishing and printing center «Kiev University», 2006. 463 p.
Hospodarskyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 06 lyst. 1991 roku № 1798-KhII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-12#Text.
Postanova KHS VS vid 13.08.2019 u spravi № 910/6920/17. URL: https://zakononline.com. ua/court-decisions/show/81844993.
Postanova KHS VS vid 15.07.2019 u spravi № 910/18587/16. URL: https://verdictum. ligazakon. net/document/83059424.
Postanova KHS VS vid 28.05.2020 u spravi № 910/13119/17. URL: https://verdictum. ligazakon.net/document/89595203.
Postanova KHS VS vid 06.04.2023 u spravi № 910/5815/21. URL: https://reyestr.court. gov.ua/Review/110107005.
Rishennia hospodarskoho sudu m. Kyieva vid 29.06.2022 u spravi № 910/11790/21. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105178244.
Rishennia hospodarskoho sudu m. Kyieva vid 07.08.2019 u spravi № 910/16373/18. URL: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/83566608.
Schechter F.I. The Rational basis of trademark protection. Harvard law review. No. 6. P. 813–833 (data zvernennia 28.10.2023).
Rishennia hospodarskoho sudu m. Kyieva vid 14.06.2021 u spravi № 910/3051/20. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/97999021#.