GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC OF THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE «FORCING TO MARRIAGE»

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.64.16889

Keywords:

criminal offense, marriage, coercion, marriage age, cohabitation without marriage

Abstract

Purpose: in the article the complex analysis of structure of the criminal offense provided by Art. 151-2 of the Criminal Code, taking into account the provisions of the theory of criminal, family, international law and criminological aspects. Methods: comparative legal analysis, cognitive-analytical and others. Results: given the comprehensive analysis of the issue, the paper analyses both the composition of the criminal offense in the form of coercion into marriage, and analyses some important issues of discussion. In particular, attention is paid to the situation when a person moved to Ukraine, one of whom was forced to marry, and the requirements for the invalidity of marriage under Ukrainian law were violated (for example, the wife is now 14 years old, she is her husband’s third wife and marriage taken only in a religious institution). Discussion: the question of whether a person who is formally married can be forced to marry is also analysed. An analysis of the qualification of this criminal offense in cases where coercion to cohabitation is combined with the presence of all their relationships, in particular with a person under 14 years of age. In addition, the article proves that the direct object of this criminal offense is the will of the person. In this case, the object in the following cases is non-compliance with the free and masculine values of the person. The victim of this crime can be any individual, regardless of age and condition. From an objective point of view, this crime consists in forcing the victim to commit the acts specified in the article. Coercion should be understood as influencing another person in order to achieve appropriate behaviour in the form of action or inaction, and includes five forms. The subject of a criminal offense is a general, it is a natural sane person who has reached 16 years of age at the time of the crime. From a subjective point of view, a criminal offense can only be committed intentionally. In this case, the purpose of motivating a person to move to the territory of a state other than the one in which he resides is forced to qualify only to force him or her to marry.

Author Biography

Sofiia Lykhova, National Aviation University

Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure of the Faculty of Law

References

Syngaivska I. Foreign experience of reglamentation of criminal responsibility for coercion to marriage. Slovo of the National School of Judges of Ukraine. 2020. № 2(31). С. 58-69. URL: https://doi.org/10.37566/2707-6849-2020-2(31)-5

Давлатов Ш.Б., Асєєва А.В. Примушування до шлюбу в аспекті протидії домашньому насильству: криміналізація та іноземний досвід. Правова позиція. № 4(29). 2020. С. 102-106. URL: https://doi.org/10.32836/2521-6473.2020-4.20

Про запобігання насильству стосовно жінок і домашньому насильству та боротьбу із цими явищами: Конвенція від 11 трав. 2011 р. URL: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/mu11251.

До президента направили вже другу петицію про ратифікацію Стамбульської конвенції. Веб-сайт: zmina.info. URL: https://zmina.info/ news/do-prezydenta-napravyly-vzhe-drugu-petycziyu-pro-ratyfikacziyu-stambulskoyi-konvencziyi/

Кримінальний кодекс України: Закон України від 05 квіт. 2001 р. № 2341-III: станом на 05 січ. 2022 р. URL: https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text

Андрушко А. Щодо доцільності криміналізації примушування до шлюбу. Націонашльний юридичний журнал: теорія та практика. 2018. № 4(1), № 32. С. 170-173.

Камінський П.В. Генезис кримінально-правового захисту від примушування до шлюбу. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Сер.: Юриспруденція. 2020. № 45. С. 129-133.

Penkova T.I., Heha V.O. Criminal liability for forced marriage. Scientific notes of Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University. Series: Juridical Sciences. 2020. № 1. С. 177-180. URL: https://doi.org/10.32838/2707-0581/2020.1/31

Таран О.С. Примушування до шлюбу: сімейно-правовий аспект. Modern researches: progress of the legislation of Ukraine and experience of the European Union: Collective monograph. Riga: Izdevniecība «Baltija Publishing», 2020. Part 2. P. 972-989.

Сімейний кодекс України: Закон України від 10 січ. 2002 р. № 2947-III. URL: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2947-14#Text

Храмцов О.М. Кримінально-правова характеристика примусу та примушування. Вісник Харківського національного університету внутрішніх справ. 2008. Вип. 40. С. 156-165.

Про міжнародне приватне право: Закон України від 23 чер. 2005 р. № 2709-IV. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2709-15#Text

References

Syngaivska I. Foreign experience of reglamentation of criminal responsibility for coercion to marriage. Slovo of the National School of Judges of Ukraine. 2020. № 2(31). S. 58-69. URL: https://doi.org/10.37566/2707-6849-2020-2(31)-5

Davlatov Sh. B., Asyeyeva A.V. Primushuvannya do shlyubu v aspekti protidiyi domashnomu nasilstvu: kriminalizaciya ta inozemnii dosvid. Pravova poziciya. № 4(29). 2020. S. 102-106. URL: https://doi.org/ 10.32836/ 2521-6473. 2020-4.20

Pro zapobigannya nasilstvu stosovno zhinok i domashnomu nasilstvu ta borotbu iz cimi yavish’ami: Konvenciya vid 11.05.2011. URL: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/mu11251.

Do prezidenta napravili vzhe drugu peticiyu pro ratifikaciyu Stambulskoyi konvenciyi. Veb-sait: zmina.info. URL: https://zmina.info/news/do-prezydenta-napravyly-vzhe-drugu-petycziyu-pro-ratyfikacziyu-stambulskoyi-konvencziyi/

Kriminalnii kodeks Ukrayini: Zakon Ukrayini vid 05.04.2001 № 2341-III: stanom na 5 sich. 2022 r. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/ 2341-14#Text

Andrushko A. SH’odo docilnosti kriminalizaciyi primushuvannya do shlyubu. Nacionalnii Yuridichnii Zhurnal: Teoriya ta Praktika. 2018. 4(1). № 32. S. 170-173.

Kaminskii P.V. Genezis kriminalno-pravovogo zahistu vid primushuvannya do shlyubu. Naukovii visnik Mizhnarodnogo gumanitarnogo universitetu. Ser.: Yurisprudenciya. 2020. № 45. S. 129-133.

Penkova T.I., Heha V.O. Criminal liability for forced marriage. Scientific notes of Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University. Series: Juridical Sciences. 2020. № 1. S. 177-180. URL: https://doi.org/10.32838/2707-0581/2020.1/31

Taran O.S. Primushuvannya do shlyubu: simeino-pravovii aspekt. Modern researches: progress of the legislation of Ukraine and experience of the European Union: Collective monograph. Riga: Izdevniecība «Baltija Publishing», 2020. Part 2. P. 972-989.

Simeinii kodeks Ukrayini: Zakon Ukrayini vid 10.01.2002 № 2947-III. URL: https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2947-14#Text

Hramcov O.M. Kriminalno-pravova harak¬teristika primusu ta primushuvannya. Visnik Harkivskogo nacionalnogo universitetu vnutrishnih. 2008. Vip. 40. S. 156-165.

Pro mizhnarodne privatne pravo: Zakon Ukrayini vid 23.06.2005 № 2709-IV. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2709-15#Text

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Lykhova, S. (2022). GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC OF THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE «FORCING TO MARRIAGE». Scientific Works of National Aviation University. Series: Law Journal "Air and Space Law", 3(64), 180–185. https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.64.16889

Issue

Section

Criminal Law and Criminology