RESEARCH ON FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS’ STEREOTYPES ABOUT LAWYER’S IMAGE: THE GENDER APPROACH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.52.13970Keywords:
professional training of future lawyers, stereotypical image of a lawyer, factor analysisAbstract
Purpose: to study the stereotypical image of a lawyer formed by first year law students as a prerequisite for professional development of personality and factors influencing this process. Methods: questionnaire (a specially designed questionnaire was used as a tool, which included questions selected by the authors of the methodology based on the analysis of studies in the field of legal psychology, and which determine the key characteristics (personal qualities) of the lawyer); factor and variance analysis. Results: it is shown that as a form of individual consciousness of high school graduates’ stereotypes fulfill a social-regulating function, act as an important component of the system of factors influencing the formation of goals for determining the direction of further vocational education and motivation for admission to the relevant institution of higher education. Average rank values, variance, and standard deviations of the mean distribution were calculated for each matrix. The hypothesis of the study was confirmed, which is that the system of characteristics of a specialist in the field of justice, which is formed from students of the first year of law school, depends on the gender of the student. It is substantiated that the primary images-stereotypes of the lawyer formed by the first-year students have clearly expressed gender characteristics that should be taken into account in the further purposeful formation of the image of the lawyer-professional. It was found out that it is worthwhile to avoid negative gender stereotypes, evaluative judgements in the process of evaluating students, focus one’s attention at complementary roles of men and women in life and social situations, equal opportunities for personality and professional development and promotion. It was concluded that educational process in a modern legal educational body should take place considering gender peculiarities of the youth; it can ensure innovative nature and personality orientation as a condition for teaching a well-qualified specialist and a development of a creative and harmonious personality. Discussion: the results of the analysis of the influence of the factors identified in the study on the formation of first-year law students stereotypes of the lawyer is an important condition for specifying pedagogical measures to develop the professional orientation of future lawyers.
References
Бочелюк В.Й. Юридична психологія: навч. посіб. Київ: ЦУЛ, 2017. 335 с.
Васильева Т.Е. Стереотипы в общественном сознании (социально-философские аспекты). Москва: ИНИОН АН СССР, 1988. 252 с.
Кон И.С. Социологическая психология: избранные психологические труды. М.-Воронеж, 1999. 156 с.
Кудрявцев Т.В., Шегурова В.Ю. Психологический анализ динамики профессионального самоопределения личности. Вопросы психологи. 1983. № 2. C. 51-59.
Липпман У. Общественное мнение / под ред. К.А. Левинсон, К.В. Петренко. Москва: Институт Фонда «Общественное мнение», 2004. 384 с. https://doi.org/10.7256/2409-7144. 2015.6. 15597
Овсянникова В.В. Динамика «образа своей профессии» в зависимости от степени приобщения к ней. Вопросы психологии. 1981. № 5. C. 133-137.
Основи загальної та юридичної психології: навч. посіб. / за ред. В.Т. Нора. Київ: Ін Юре, 2014. 280 с.
Прикладная юридическая психология: учеб. пособие для вузов / под ред. Столяренко А.М. Москва: ЮНИТИ-ДАНА, 2001. 639 с.
Русина Н.А. Изучение оценочных эталонов и социальных стереотипов с помощью семантических измерений. Вопросы психологии. 1981. № 5. С. 96-106.
Стандарт вищої освіти за спеціальністю 081 «Право» галузі знань 08 «Право» для першого (бакалаврського) рівня вищої освіти. URL: https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/vishcha-osvita/standarty. https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230. 18.4.8
Шихирев П.Н. Социальная установка как предмет социально-психологического исследования. Психологические проблемы социальной регуляции поведения. Москва, 1976. C. 278-294.
A hierarchical taxonomy of human goals / Chulef Ada S., Read Stephen J., Walsh David A. Notiv. And Emot. 2001. № 3. P. 191-232.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1969. 567 p.
Hyde J.S. Gender and sex: So what has meta-analysis done for me? The Psychology Teacher Network Newsletter. 1992. № 2. Р. 2-6.
Hyde J.S., & Linn, M.C. The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986. Pp. 14-50.
Lipsey M.W., & Wilson D.B. The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. American Psychologist. 1993. № 48. Р. 1181-1209. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x. 48.12.1181
The roots of motivations: Classroom and cultural factors. Education Section Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society, Greenwich, 6-7 Nov. 1999. / Elliott J., Hufton N. Proc. Brit. Psychol. Soc. 2001. № 1. Р. 3.
References
Bocheljuk V.J. Jurydychna psyhologija: navch. posib. Kyi’v: CUL, 2017. 335 s.
Vasil’eva T.E. Stereotipy v obshhestvennom soznanii (social’no-filosofskie aspekty). Moskva: INION AN SSSR, 1988. 252 s.
Kon I.S. Sociologicheskaja psihologija: izbrannye psihologicheskie trudy. M.-Voronezh, 1999. 156 s.
Kudrjavcev T.V., Shegurova V.Ju. Psihologicheskij analiz dinamiki professional’nogo samoopredelenija lichnosti. Voprosy psihologii. 1983. № 2. C. 51-59.
Lippman U. Obshhestvennoe mnenie / pod red. K.A. Levinson, K.V. Petrenko. Moskva: Institut Fonda «Obshhestvennoe mnenie», 2004. 384 s.
Ovsjannikova V.V. Dinamika «obraza svoej professii» v zavisimosti ot stepeni priobshhenija k nej. Voprosy psihologii. 1981. № 5. C. 133-137.
Osnovy zagal’noi’ ta jurydychnoi’ psyhologii’: navch. posib. / za red. V.T. Nora. Kyi’v: In Jure, 2014. 280 s.
Prikladnaja juridicheskaja psihologija: ucheb. posobie dlja vuzov / pod red. Stoljarenko A.M. Moskva: JuNITI-DANA, 2001. 639 s.
Rusina N.A. Izuchenie ocenochnyh jetalonov i social’nyh stereotipov s pomoshh’ju semanticheskih izmerenij. Voprosy psihologii. 1981. № 5. S. 96-106.
Standart vyshhoi’ osvity za special’nistju 081 «Pravo» galuzi znan’ 08 «Pravo» dlja pershogo (bakalavrs’kogo) rivnja vyshhoi’ osvity. URL: https://mon.gov.ua/ storage/ app/media/vishcha-osvita/standarty.
Shihirev P.N. Social’naja ustanovka kak predmet social’no-psihologicheskogo issledovanija. Psihologicheskie problemy social’noj reguljacii povedenija. Moskva, 1976. C. 278-294.
A hierarchical taxonomy of human goals / Chulef Ada S., Read Stephen J., Walsh David A. Notiv. And Emot. 2001. № 3. P. 191-232.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1969. 567 p.
Hyde J.S. Gender and sex: So what has meta-analysis done for me? The Psychology Teacher Network Newsletter. 1992. № 2. Р. 2-6.
Hyde J.S., & Linn, M.C. The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986. Pp. 14-50.
Lipsey M.W., & Wilson D.B. The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. American Psychologist. 1993. № 48. Р. 1181-1209.
The roots of motivations: Classroom and cultural factors. Education Section Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society, Greenwich, 6-7 Nov. 1999. / Elliott J., Hufton N. Proc. Brit. Psychol. Soc. 2001. № 1. Р. 3.
