ПРАВОВА АНТРОПОЛОГІЯ ЯК МЕТОДОЛОГІЯ ДОСЛІДЖЕННЯ ПРАВ ЛЮДИНИ І ГРОМАДЯНИНА – ІСТОРИКО-ПРАВОВИЙ АНАЛІЗ

Іван Лук'янович Бородін

doi:10.18372/2307-9061.49.13343

Authors

Іван Лук'янович Бородін Національний авіаційний університет

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.49.13343

Keywords:

anthropology, social systems, comparative jurisprudence, principles, a conceptual apparatus, paradigm, consensus, sources of law

Abstract

Purpose: anthropological principles of human rights in the legal field in order to substantiate and establish the humanistic nature of law in the context of the principles of democracy implementation have been analyzed in the paper. Methods: phenomenological; hermeneutic; comparative-legal; sociological; logical; dialectical. Results: the nature and a place of the category of «legal anthropology» have been clarified, concept of «a human and law» content problems have been considered, attention has been paid to the fact that legal anthropology is a multidisciplinary sphere of knowledge about the interrelation between a human and law. Discussion: approaches to the correlation of a human and law problem that content have been determined by the recognition of a human as the highest social value, the form of reflection and the way of moral principles in social relations embodiment.

The historiographical review of the problems of legal anthropology studies reflects the multidimensional nature of its problems and attempts to resolve them, and demonstrates that legal anthropology has its own history and tradition. Being born among other disciplines, legal anthropology develops as an integrated, interdisciplinary scientific direction, which explores law on the basis of anthropological approach. At the same time, the content that various researchers have contained and still contain in the concept of anthropological approach and anthropology is different.

The historiographic review of the problems of legal anthropology confirms its multidimensionality and raises a question of its system. A systematic review of the problems of legal anthropology, which aims to generalize the issues of its research, offers its multidimensional.

Anthropological principles of human rights in the legal field in order to substantiate and establish the humanistic nature of law in the context of the principles of democracy implementation have been analyzed in the paper. The nature and a place of the category of «legal anthropology» have been clarified, concept of «a human and law» content problems have been considered, attention has been paid to the fact that legal anthropology is a multidisciplinary sphere of knowledge about the interrelation between a human and law. The approaches to the correlation of a human and law problem that content have been determined by the recognition of a human as the highest social value, the form of reflection and the way of moral principles in social relations embodiment.

Author Biography

Іван Лук'янович Бородін, Національний авіаційний університет

завідувач кафедри теорії та історії держави і права

References

Рулан Н. Юридическая антропология: учебник / Н. Рулан; пер. с фр. – М., 1999. – С. 25.

Sir Maine H. S. Ancient Law: its connection with the early history of society and its relation to modern ideas. – L., 1891.

Sir Maine H. S. Ibid. – P. 170.

Nader L. The Anthropological Study of Law // American Anthropologist. – 1965. – № 67/6. – P. 8.

Bachofen J. J. Das Mutterrecht. – Stuttgart, 1861.

Morgan H. L. Ancient Society. – N.Y., 1877.

Энгельс Ф. Происхождение семьи, частной собственности и государства / Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. // Избранные произведения в двух томах. – М., 1949. – Т. 2. – С. 174–310.

МсLennan J. F. Primitive marriage. – Edinburgh, 1865; Його ж: Studies in ancient history, comprising a reprint of primitive marriage. – L., 1886.

Kovalevsky M. Tableau des origines et de l’evolution de la famille et de la propiete. – Stockholm, 1890. Цит. за: Энгельс Ф. Цит. соч. – С. 205-206.

Malinowski B. Crime and Custom in Savage Society. – L., 1926.

Llewellyn K. and Hoebel E. A. The Cheyenne Way: case and conflict in primitive jurisprudence. – Norman Okla, 1941.

Gluckman M. The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. – Manchester, 1954; Hoebel E. A. The Law of Primitive Man. – Cambridge Mass., 1954; Smith W., Roberts J. Zuni Law: a field of values. – Cambridge Mass., 1954; Howell P.P. Manual of Nuer Law. – L., 1954; Bohan-nan P. J. Justice and judgment among the Tiv. – L., 1957; Pospisil L. Kapauku Papuans and their law. – New Haven, 1958; Pospisil L. Social Change and primitive law: consequences of Papuan legal case // American Anthropologist. – 1958. – № 60. – P. 832–837; Berndt R. M. Excess and restraint. Social Con-trol Among a New Guinea Mountain People. – Chicago and L., 1962; Gulliver P. H. Social control in an African society: a study of the Arusha, agricultural Masai of Northern Tanganyika. – Boston, 1963.

Lampe E.-J. Rechtsanthropologie. Erster Band Individualstrukturen in der Rechtsordnung. – Berlin, 1970.

Broekman J. M. Recht und Anthropologie. – Freiburg, 1979. – S. 12, 206.

Rosen L. The Anthropology of Justice: law as culture in Islamic society. – Cambridge, 1989.

Starr J., Collier J. F. History and Power in the Study of Law: new directions in legal anthropology. – Ithaca, 1989.

Fikentscher W. Modes of Thought: A Study in the Anthropology of Law and Religion. – Tübingen, 1995.

Mertz E. Language, Law, and Social Meanings: Linguistic / Anthropological Contributions to the Study of Law // Law & Society Review. – 1992. – № 26. – P. 413.

French R. R. Golden Yoke: the legal cosmology of the Buddhism Tibet. – Ithaca, 1995.

Moore S. F. Certainties undone: fifty turbulent years of legal anthropology, 1949-1999 // Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. – 2001. – № 7. – P. 95-116.

References

Rulan N. Juridicheskaja antropologija. Uchebnik: per. s fr. – M., 1999. – S. 25.

Sir Maine H. S. Ancient Law: its connection with the early history of society and its relation to modern ideas. – L., 1891.

Sir Maine H. S. Ibid. – P. 170.

Nader L. The Anthropological Study of Law // American Anthropologist. – 1965. – № 67/6. – P. 8.

Bachofen J. J. Das Mutterrecht. – Stuttgart, 1861.

Morgan H. L. Ancient Society. – N.Y., 1877.

Jengel’s F. Proishozhdenie sem’i, chastnoj sobstvennosti i gosudarstva // Marks K., Jengel’s F. Izbrannye proizvedenija v dvuh tomah. – M., 1949. – T. 2. – S. 174–310.

MsLennan J. F. Primitive marriage. – Edinburgh, 1865; Jogo zh: Studies in ancient history, comprising a reprint of primitive marriage. – L., 1886.

Kovalevsky M. Tableau des origines et de l’evolution de la famille et de la propiete. – Stockholm, 1890. Cit. za: Jengel’s F. Cit. soch. – S. 205-206.

Malinowski B. Crime and Custom in Savage Society. – L., 1926.

Llewellyn K. and Hoebel E. A. The Cheyenne Way: case and conflict in primitive jurisprudence. – Norman Okla, 1941.

Gluckman M. The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. – Manchester, 1954; Hoebel E. A. The Law of Primitive Man. – Cambridge Mass., 1954; Smith W., Roberts J. Zuni Law: a field of values. – Cambridge Mass., 1954; Howell P. P. Manual of Nuer Law. – L., 1954; Bohan-nan P. J. Justice and judgment among the Tiv. – L., 1957; Pospisil L. Kapauku Papuans and their law. – New Haven, 1958; Pospisil L. Social Change and primitive law: consequences of Papuan legal case // American Anthropologist. – 1958. – № 60. – P. 832–837; Berndt R. M. Excess and restraint. Social Control Among a New Guinea Mountain People. – Chicago and L., 1962; Gulliver P. H. Social control in an African society: a study of the Arusha, agricultural Masai of Northern Tanganyika. – Boston, 1963.