The assessment of Ukraine’s prospects for the fossil fuels phase-out

Authors

  • Margaryta Myroslavivna Radomska National Aviation University
  • Marina Serhiyivna Ponomarenko National Aviation University
  • Taras Ihorovych Nazarkov National Aviation University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/2310-5461.48.15090

Keywords:

climate change, pollution, environment, PESTLE analysis, energy combination, renewable sources of energy

Abstract

The running out of fossil fuels reserves and growing degradation of the environment quality have contributed to the formation of new vision of economy development, based on transition to green energy. An essential part of this process is the abandonment of fossil fuels extraction and processing facilities, as well as complete ban on their further use. As of today Ukraine has a range of serious problems in the field of energy supply provision, due to lack of domestic energy minerals reserves and dependence on their import. Moreover, the complicated geopolitical situation in the region makes the state government seek for alternative sources for the diversification of supply. As a result, Ukraine has even more reasons for phasing-out fossil fuels, than other countries of the world. The study of the existing international agreements and national strategies adopted in European region showed that most developed countries have already started to implement some elements of the Paris agreement on the abandonment of fossil fuels. In most cases this refers to limitation on cars with internal combustion engines at cities and decommissioning of coal powered thermal plants. The pros and cons of implementing state plans on changing carbon based energy to alternative power generation strategies was assessed using the method of PESTLE analysis, which defines the influence of external factors and risks for any strategy, in particular political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental. The central problem in the process of moving away from fossil fuels based economy is finding efficient substitution for them among alternative renewable sources of energy with minimal impacts on the environment. To analyze the benefits of any possible alternative the matrix method was used, in which all alternatives are graded by the scale in relation to a set of valuable factors/parameters. The results of the PESTLE analysis show that social and environmental factors have the highest contributing potential to the process, while political and economic factors may form both positive and negative drivers, limiting the efficiency of other factors. The comparison of the substitution alternatives, including use of geothermal energy, bioenergy, increase in nuclear, wind or solar energy and energy mix, demonstrated that the energy mix is the one with the best outcomes at lower investments. However, it needs careful planning and localization of solutions. Another important finding is that the fossil fuels abandoning for Ukraine is impossible without the nuclear energy input. Thus, it is concluded that there is a need to work thoroughly on the improvement of energy efficiency, as it can reduce the volume of the necessary energy supply.

Author Biographies

Margaryta Myroslavivna Radomska, National Aviation University

Assistant Professor, Ph.D., Associate Professor

Marina Serhiyivna Ponomarenko, National Aviation University

Kiev ecological and cultural center

Taras Ihorovych Nazarkov, National Aviation University

Student, Department of Ecology

References

Andreoni V. (2020) The energy metabolism of countries: Energy efficiency and use in the period that followed the global financial crisis. Energy Policy, Vol. 139, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111304

Global Energy Statistical Yearbook 2019

Bilgen S. (2014) Structure and environmental impact of global energy consumption. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 38, pp. 890-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.004

Jamel L., Derbali A. (2016) Do energy consumption and economic growth lead to environmental degradation? Evidence from Asian economies. Cogent Economics & Finance, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 1170653–1170670. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1170653

Lyulchak Z. (2019) Mechanisms of demand and supply formation for the services of energy efficiency. Journal of Lviv Polytechnic National University. Series of Economics and Management, Vol. 7, Issue 4(2), pp. 135-146. doi: 10.23939/semi2019.04.135

Energy Efficiency Indicators 2020, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-efficiency-indicators-2020

Kholod N., Evans M., Denysenk A., Roshchanka V. Improving Ukraine's Energy Security: the Role of Energy Efficiency. Washington: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2018. 37 p. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35663.12965.

Sendich E. Comparison of International Energy Intensities Across the G7 and Other Parts of Europe, Including Ukraine. Washington: U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2014. 20 p. https://www.eia.gov/workingpapers/pdf/international_energy_Intensity.pdf.

Energy market in Ukraine. Overview of the sector and future projects. Brussels: Flanders Investment and Trade, 2018. 58 p.

Energy Strategy of Ukraine for the Period up to 2035 “Security, Energy Efficiency, Competitiveness” Approved by the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, 18 August, 2017, No. 605-p, 31 p.

Green Economy options for Ukraine: Opportunities for greening the energy sector. Policy Brief. Geneva-Kyiv: United Nations Environment Programme, 2018. 36 p.

Antonenko A., Nitsovych R., Pavlenko O., Takac K. (2018) Reforming Ukraine’s Energy Sector: Critical Unfinished Business. Carnegie Europe, Zentrum für Osteuropa und Internationale Studien, 14 p.

Snihur V., Malashkevych D., Vvedenska T. (2016) Tendencies of coal industry development in Ukraine, Mining of Mineral Deposits, Vol. 10, Issue 2, pp. 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/mining10.02.001

IRENA, REmap 2030 Renewable Energy Prospects for Ukraine. IRENA, Abu Dhabi, 2015. 53 p.

Ritchie H., Roser M. (2017) CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Retrieved from: 'https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions' [Online Resource]

Kharecha P.A., Hansen J.E. (2008) Implications of "peak oil" for atmospheric CO2 and climate, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 22 (3), pp. 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003142

Energy [R]evolution. A sustainable world energy outlook. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International, European Renewable Energy Council, 2010. 260 p.

Jones D., Gutmann K. End of an era: why every European country needs a coal phase-out plan. London, UK and Brussels, Belgium: Greenpeace and Climate Action Network Europe, 2015. 22 p.

Muttitt G. The sky's limit: why the Paris climate goals require a managed decline of fossil fuel production. Washington: Oil Change International, 2016. 60 p

Gareth A., Edwards S. (2019) Coal and climate change, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 11, Issue 2, pp. 57-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.607

Tanaka K., Cavalett O., Collins W.J. (2019) Asserting the climate benefits of the coal-to-gas shift across temporal and spatial scales. Nat. Clim. Chang., 9, pp. 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0457-1

Ramanathan V., Haines A., Burnett R.T., Pozzer A., Klingmüller K., Lelieveld J. (2019) Effects of fossil fuel and total anthropogenic emission removal on public health and climate, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116 (15), pp. 7192–7197. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1819989116

Tvinnereim E., Ivarsflaten E. (2016) Fossil fuels, employment, and support for climate policies. Energy Policy, 96, pp. 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.052

Granoff I., Hogarth J.R., Wykes S., Doig A. Beyond coal: scaling up clean energy to fight global poverty. London: Overseas Development Institute, 2016. 24 p.

Burkea A., Fishelb S. (2020) A coal elimination treaty 2030: Fast tracking climate change mitigation, global health and security, Earth System Governance, Vol. 3, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100046

Owusu P.A., Asumadu-Sarkodie S. (2016) A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation, Cogent Engineering, 3, 1, pp. 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990

Gielen D., Boshell F., Saygin D., Bazilian M.D., Wagner N., Gorini R. (2019) The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation, Energy Strategy Reviews, Vol. 24, pp. 38-50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006.

Boichenko S.V., Shkilniuk I.A., Cherniak L.M., Makarenko Y.S., Karelin Yu.V. (2014) Ecological Aspects of Petroleum Motor Fuels Usage (Review) Energy technologies and resource saving, 5-6, pp. 35-44.

Kothari R., Tyagi V.V., Pathak A. (2010) Waste-to-energy: A way from renewable energy sources to sustainable development, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, Issue 9, pp. 3164-3170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.05.005.

Kreith F., Goswami, D. Handbook of energy efficiency and renewable energy. Second edition. London: CRS Press, 2016. 1765 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420003482.

Pearce, J.M. (2012) Limitations of Nuclear Power as a Sustainable Energy Source, Sustainability, 4, 1173-1187. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4061173

Green R.; Staffell I. (2016) Electricity in Europe: exiting fossil fuels? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 32 (2), pp. 282–303. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grw003

Overland I., Bazilian M., Talgat I.U., Vakulchuk R., Westphal K. (2019) The GeGaLo index: Geopolitical gains and losses after energy transition, Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, pp. 100406-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100406

Kim-Keung Ho J. (2014) Formulation of a Systemic PEST Analysis for Strategic Analysis. European academic research, Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp. 6478-6492.

Ramik J. (2017) Ranking Alternatives by Pairwise Comparisons Matrix and Priority Vector, Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 64, pp. 85-95. 10.1515/saeb-2017-0040.

Křovák J. (1987) Ranking alternatives – comparison of different methods based on binary comparison matrices, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 32, Issue 1, pp. 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90273-6

Chumak D., Prokip A. (2018) Regional stability through energy cooperation: the case of the EU and Ukraine, European view, Vol. 17, Issue 1, pp. 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685818766449

Nuclear Power in Ukraine: country profile. World Nuclear Association. Retreived from: https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-t-z/ukraine.aspx

Energoatom, SSTC NRS and Holtec International signed Partnership Agreement for the establishment of international consortium. Retreived from http://www.energoatom.com.ua/en/press_center-19/company-20/p/energoatom_sstc_nrs_and_holtec_international_signed_partnership_agreement_for_establishment_of_international_consortium-45069

Small Modular Reactors: Nuclear Energy Market Potential for Near-term Deployment. Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 2016. 75 p.

Morozov Y., Barylo A. Geothermal Energy Use, Country Update for Ukraine. Den Haag: European Geothermal Congress, 2019, pp. 1-6.

Janda K., Stankus E. Biofuels Markets and Policies in Ukraine. Prague: University of Economics, 2017. 26 p.

Kharlamova G., Nate S., Chernyak O. (2016) Renewable energy and security for Ukraine: challenge or smart way? Journal of International Studies, Vol. 9, 1, pp. 88-115. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-1/7

Issue

Section

Ecology, chemical technology, biotechnology, bioengineering