The contemporary role of context in decision making

Authors

  • Василь Іванович Надточій
  • Юрій Петрович Чаплінський

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/2073-4751.61.14035

Keywords:

decision-support system, decision-making, context, knowledge management

Abstract

Modern decision-making with the use of knowledge-based technologies is seen as a powerful competitive advantage in the enterprise, focused on permanent changes in business processes. The activities of both individuals and systems are increasingly dependent on the use of knowledge as one of the most valuable resources. The complexity of implementing such decision-making is the need to synthesize different points of view on the problem, use of terms and concepts from various subject areas, to describe their management ideas with a large amount of information relevant to the problem, and understanding of the problem decisions, etc. Decision-making and integration components of decision making based on the representation of multi-level governance and decision-making through the context model. Context assists to identify, understand, and provide the relevant elements of decision-making. The presented approach is aimed at building a context model representing the problem(s) to be solved by the decision support system. Context describes factors influencing the problem and provides requirements to solutions to be generated for the decision maker. The context is defined as a collection of objects in which each object has a set of names and relations, and represents a construct consisting of concepts within the context areas and is described by the context ontology. The context framework takes into account different context areas, such as: purpose/result, actor, process/action, object, environment, facility, tools, presentation, location, and time. The decision making is suggested being modeled by three types of contexts: abstract, concrete and realization. Objects, relationships, and attributes are used to represent contextual domains. Contextual concepts are interconnected through relationships, including intradomain, interdomain and intercontextual relationships. Possible contextual relationships between contextual domains that can be structural (hierarchical) and semantic (associative) are presented.

References

Giunchiglia F. A facet-based methodology for the construction of a large-scale geospatial ontology / Giunchiglia F., Dutta B., Maltese V., Farazi F. // Journal on Data Semantics, 2012, 1, pp. 57-73.

Dey A.K. A Conceptual Framework and a Toolkit for Supporting the Rapid Prototyping of Context Aware Applications / Dey A.K., Salber D., Abowd G.D. // Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) Journal, 2001, 16, pp. 97-166.

Dourish P. What we talk about when we talk about context // Personal and ubiquitous computing, 2004, 8, pp. 19-30.

Bazire M. Understanding Context Before Using it / Bazire M., Brézillon P. // In: Dey, A. et al. (eds.) CONTEXT 2005, LNAI 3554. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2005, pp. 29-40.

Bettini C. A survey of context modelling and reasoning techniques / Bettini C., Brdiczka O., Henricksen K., Indulska, J., Nicklas, D., Ranganathan A., Riboni D. // Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2010, 6, pp. 161-180.

Gu T. An ontology-based context model in intelligent environments / Gu T., Wang X. H., Pung H. K., Zhang D. Q. // In Proceedings of communication networks and distributed systems modeling and simulation conference, 2004, pp. 270-275.

Porzel R. Contextual Computing: Models and Applications. (Cognitive Technologies) // Springer Verlag, 2010, 180 p.

Чаплінський Ю.П. Онтологічне представлення процесів прийняття рішень // Проблеми інформатизації та управління. – 2009. – № 2 (26). – С. 146-151

Issue

Section

Статті