Comprehensive Framework for Design and Modernization of Avionics Management Systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.80.18690

Keywords:

methodological basis, operation system, avionics, design and modernization, life cycle, modern information technologies

Abstract

The efficiency and safety of civil aviation heavily depend on the robust performance of avionic systems, which provide essential communication, navigation, and surveillance capabilities for flight operations. To sustain the requisite level of reliability in these complex systems, a methodological foundation for their design and modernization is critical. This paper presents a comprehensive framework for the Avionics Management System, emphasizing systematic component analysis and developmental methodologies. This framework includes a multidisciplinary approach that integrates advanced principles, theories, models, and methods drawn from current achievements in information technology, artificial intelligence, mathematical statistics, and decision-making theory. It also considers societal needs, economic trends, and future developmental prospects. Proposed approach ensures that AMS not only addresses immediate operational requirements but is also adaptable to future technological evolutions, thus supporting the life cycle of avionic systems from conception through to utilization. The proposed framework is poised to guide the industry in achieving higher levels of system reliability and maintenance efficiency, with potential implications for the broader realm of civil aviation and its ever-advancing technological landscape.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Solomentsev, National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine

Doctor of Engineering

Professor

Department of telecommunication and radio electronic systems

Igor Kabashkin, Transport and Telecommunication Institute, Riga

Doctor of Engineering

Professor

Engineering Faculty 

Maksym Zaliskyi , National Aviation University, Kyiv

Doctor of Engineering

Professor   

Department of telecommunication and radio electronic systems

Oleksii Zuiev, National Aviation University, Kyiv

PhD

Associate Professor    

Department of telecommunication and radio electronic systems

References

B. S. Dhillon, Maintainability, maintenance, and reliability for engineers, New York: Taylor & Francis Group, 2006, 214 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006780.

M. Rausand, System reliability theory: models, statistical methods and applications, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004, 458 p.

D. J. Smith, Reliability, Maintainability and Risk. Practical methods for engineers, London: Elsevier, 2005, 365 p.

I. Gertsbakh, Reliability theory: with applications to preventive maintenance, New York: Springer, 2005, 220 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04236-6.

A. Anand and M. Ram, System reliability management: solutions and techniques, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2018, 276 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351117661.

M. Modarres and K. Groth, Reliability and risk analysis, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2023, 480 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003307495.

O. C. Okoro, M. Zaliskyi, S. Dmytriiev, O. Solomentsev, and O. Sribna, “Optimization of maintenance task interval of aircraft systems,” International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security, vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 77–89, 2022. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijcnis.2022.02.07.

O. Solomentsev, M. Zaliskyi, Yu. Nemyrovets, and M. Asanov, “Signal processing in case of radio equipment technical state deterioration,” Signal Processing Symposium 2015 (SPS 2015), Proceedings, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPS.2015.7168312.

O. Solomentsev, M. Zaliskyi, O. Shcherbyna, and O. Kozhokhina, “Sequential procedure of changepoint analysis during operational data processing,” IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques in Wireless Communications, 2020, Proceedings, pp. 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTTW51045.2020.9245068.

H. Yan, H. Zuo, J. Tang, R. Wang, and X. Ma, “Predictive maintenance framework of the aircraft system based on PHM information,” Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Advanced Reliability and Maintenance Modeling, Proceedings, 2020, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/APARM49247.2020.9209454.

A. Raza and V. Ulansky, “Optimization of condition monitoring decision making by the criterion of minimum entropy,” Entropy (Basel), vol. 21, Issue 12 (1193), 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21121193.

S. Hosseini, M. A. Vaziry-Zanjany, and H. R. Ovesy, “A framework for aircraft conceptual de-sign and multidisciplinary optimization,” Aerospace, vol. 11, Issue 4 (273), 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11040273.

A. Raza, “Maintenance model of digital avionics,” Aerospace, vol. 5, Issue 2 (38), 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace5020038.

A. K. Jeyaraj and S. Liscouët-Hanke, “A Safety-focused system architecting framework for the conceptual design of aircraft systems,” Aerospace, vol. 9, Issue 12 (791), 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9120791.

A. A. Pohya, J. Wehrspohn, R. Meissner, and K. Wicke, “A modular framework for the life cycle based evaluation of aircraft technologies, maintenance strategies, and operational decision making using discrete event simulation,” Aerospace, vol. 8, Issue 7 (187), 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8070187.

F. Riaz, “Development of framework for acquisition of avionics integration capability,” INCAS Bulletin, vol. 7, Issue 4, pp. 183–193, 2015. https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2015.7.4.17.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-25

Issue

Section

TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND RADIO ENGINEERING