REPRODUCTION OF THE PERSON'S LIVING ENVIRONMENT WITH THE HELP OF RESOCIALIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2411-264X.13.13396Keywords:
living space, socialization, de-socialization, resocialization, resocialization stages, anomieAbstract
The author of the article emphasizes that the ability to live in a restructured environment and time has its limits, through which the society is being exposed to mass madness. Therefore, both the individual and the society feel the need for concentration of environment and time (statehood, independence, effective reforms, on which one could see the end of the test, etc.). Recently, in order to solve their own problems, people use illegal acts more often than in pre-reform period.
The author of the article draws attention to the ideas relevant in the research of humanistic strategy and reveals new aspects of it. It is about how a person recreates his or her own living environment, constructs a humanistic component of social reality, and interprets the nature of the changes that occur in this reality; what meanings and values are invested in the occurring events; which situation defines for itself as requiring value-symbolic comprehension, but which does not require a personal orientation; how is the choice of a strategy of existence and behavior patterns is executed, etc.
Based on the analysis of the sources and relevance of the selected problem, the objective of the article is to study the mechanisms and specific features of the resocialization processes used by the individual when reproducing their own living space. The author of the article draws your attention to the accents placed by social interpretation of the meaning of «resocialization».
Methods for theoretical analysis (logical, ontological and ontogenetic, historiographical, factual, phenomenological, deterministic) were used to check assumptions and to solve the tasks.
References
Авраменко, В. (2010). Научное понимание ресоциализации как социально-педагогической цели работы с заключенным. Актуальные проблемы совершенной психологии и педагогики, Вып. 1, 5-9.
Андреева, Г. М. (2000) Психология социального познания: учеб. пособие для студ. психол. и пед. спец. вузов. – Москва: Прогресс.
Белинская, Е., Стафаненко, Т. (2000). Этническая социализация подростка. Москва: Изд-во НПО «Модек».
Гидденс, Э. (2005). Социология. Москва: URSS.
Злобіна, О. (2002). Рухливість соціальної структури і динаміка особистісної суб’єктивності. Проблеми розвитку соціологічної теорії. − К.: Соціологічна асоціація України, Інститут соціології НАН України, 429-434.
Малешин, Д. (2002). Понятие стадии в исполнительном производстве. Вестник МГУ, № 6, 110–120.
Мерлин, В. (1990). Структура личности: характер, способности, самопознание. Пермь: ПГПИ.
Смелзер, Н. (1994). Социология. Москва: Феникс.
Франкл, В. (1990). Человек в поисках смысла. Москва: Прогресс.
Шевченко, А. (2004). Социокультурная обусловленность ресоциализации дезадаптантов и девиантов в процессе общественных изменений. (Дис. доктора социологических наук). Ростовский государственный педагогический университет, Ростов-на-Дону.
