Copyright and cloud computing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.30.8503Keywords:
copyright, cloud, internet, computing, software, contentAbstract
This article defines possible problems in the copyright regime, which appears in cloud computing process, basically on the analysis of the judicial practice of cloud computing cases, describes current and perspective vitality of the copyright in the cloud. The article doesn’t discuss the issue of copyright infringement by individual users; attention is paid to the issue of copyright protection by network intermediaries: ISPs and operators of sites and services that typically fall under the legal definition of the providers of "interactive computer services" or "providers of online services". Foreign scientists carried a series of theoretical studies on the problems of the copyright protection and cloud computing. For instance, the works of such scholars as Lessing L., Jonothan E., Pierre N. Leval, Scale M.-S. are devoted to the certain aspects of the copyright protection in the cloud. However, these problems are less explored in the national scientific opinion.
References
The United States Code, Title 17 – Copyrights, § 230(f) (2), (2006) [An electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://uscode.house. gov/browse/
The United States Code, Title 17 – Copyrights, § 512(k) (1) (A) [An electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://uscode.house.gov/browse/
MAI Sys. Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc., 991 F.2d 511, 518 (9th Cir. 1993) [An electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.law. cornell. edu/copyright/cases/ 991_F2d_511.htm
Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communication Services, Inc., 907 F. Supp. 1361 (N.D. Cal. 1995) [An electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.law.cornell. edu/copyright/ cases/907_FSupp_1361.htm
PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES, INC. v. George FRENA (839 F.Supp. 1552 (1993)) [An electronic resource]. – Access mode:. http://scholar. google.com/scholar_case?case=994289757272580461& hl=en&as_ sdt = 2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Netcom On-Line Commc’n Servs., Inc., 907 F. Supp. 1361, 1370 (N.D. Cal. 1995) [An electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.law.cornell.edu/ copy-right/cases/ 907_FSupp_ 1361.htm
Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Pub. L. No. 105-304, 112 Stat. 2860 (Oct. 28, 1998).
The United States Code, Title 17 – Copy-rights, §§ 107–22 [An electronic resource]. – Ac-cess mode: http://uscode.house.gov/ browse/
Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enters, 471 U.S. 539 (1985) [An electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.law.cornell. edu/copyright/cases/471_US_539.htm
Pierre N. Leval, Commentary, Toward a Fair Use Standard, 103 HARV. L. REV. 1105, 1111 (1990) [An electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/claw /levalfrustd.htm
Nuechterlein, Jonathan E. Digital cross-roads: American telecommunications policy in the Internet age / Jonathan E. Nuechterlein and Philip J. Weiser. – Massachusetts Institute of Technol-ogy, 2005. – 670 p.
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Akanoc Solutions, Inc., No. C07-03952, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85266, at *23–24 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2010) [An electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.lawupdates. com/ commentary/ ilouis_vuitton_malletier_v._akanoc_solutions_i/
