On the issue of the unification of the application of substantive law on recognition of contracts null and void

Authors

  • Дмитро Олександрович Беззубов National Aviation University
  • Надія Олексіївна Армаш National Aviation University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.43.11804

Keywords:

standardization, rule of law, substantive law, contract

Abstract

The problem in the application of substantive law on recognition of contracts null and void. Analyzes recent court cases on this subject. Served theory and practice of business law application of substantive law courts. Served views of scientists on issues of application of substantive law. Identify areas for further scientific research into the problem of application of substantive law. Accordingly, Article 203 of the does not conflict with the content of the treaty The Code, other acts of civil law, as well as the interests of the state and Society, its moral principles. The person who makes the transaction must Have the necessary amount of civilian capacity. Statement of the participant The transaction must be free and consistent with his inner will. Right Must be committed in the form prescribed by law. The lawyer should be Is aimed at the real onset of legal consequences that are caused by them. The law of the parents (adopters) can not be contradicted The rights and interests of their juvenile, minors or disabled children. Part 1 of Article 251 of the Central Committee notes that the grounds for invalidity The transaction is non-compliance at the time of the transaction by the party (Parties) of the requirements established by parts one, three, five and Sixth article 203 of the code. Consequently, the above-mentioned article defines general legal principles Recognition of the transaction invalid. Such principles of the Central Committee recognize the fact Non-compliance by one party or all parties with the requirements established Parts 3, 5, 6 of Art. 203 of the Central omitted, that is, the requirements regarding the will of the participant An agreement regarding the actual legal consequences of the transaction regarding Inadmissibility of violation of the law, committed by parents, interests Young children That is, violation of the requirements of the law, accepted by the party (Parties) after the conclusion of the transaction, can not cause it Nullity, but lead to other legal consequences provided for By law Invalidity of the transaction may occur only for certain violations The law. Invalidity of economic contracts in its content, form and Direction is an illegal transaction that violates a particular or The general rule of law and leads to the consequences that are inherent in any one Improper action, namely the prevention of the preservation of their power and results Which has come, to restore the status of the relevant law. According to the Civil Code of Ukraine (Art. 174), economic obligations arise from economic contracts (and Other transactions), that is, they are linked by a certain legal bond.

Author Biographies

Дмитро Олександрович Беззубов, National Aviation University

Professor at the Department of Economic, Air and Space Law

Надія Олексіївна Армаш, National Aviation University

Professor at the Department of Economic, Air and Space Law

References

Гук А. Деякі питання недійсності правочинів в контексті судової практики / А. Гук [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/2364/Huk_Deiaki%20pytannia%20nediisnosti%20pravochyniv%20.pdf;jsessionid=4802655B88A3B0DF989ABE7C6F053029?sequence=3

Господарський кодекс України від 16 січня 2003 р. № 436-ІV // Відомості Верховної Ради України. – 2003. – № 18. – Ст. 144 [зі змін. та допов.].

Цивільний кодекс України від 16 січня 2003 р. № 435-ІV // Відомості Верховної Ради України. – 2003. – № 40. – Ст. 356 [зі змін. та допов.].

Давидова І. В. Недійсність господарського договору за законодавством України / І. В. Давидова // Порівняльно-аналітичне право. – 2014. – № 2. – С. 107-110.

Про деякі питання визнання правочинів (господарських договорів) недійсними: поста-нова Пленуму ВГСУ від 29 травня 2013 р. № 11 [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0011600-13

Смола С. В. Визнання недійсним припиненого правочину: аналіз практики вищих судів / С. В. Смола [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://lg.arbitr.gov.ua/sud5014/4673456/279659/

Подоляк С. А. Неукладеність господарських договорів – погляд зблизька / С. А. Подоляк // Часопис Київського університету права. – 2009. – № 2. – С. 151-154.

Прилуцький Р. Б. Щодо проблеми визнання господарських договорів недійсними / Р. Б. Прилуцький, А. А. Зерниченко // Юридична наука. – 2014. – № 2. – С. 51.

References

Guk A. Dejaki pytannja nedijsnosti pravochyniv v konteksti sudovoi’ praktyky / A. Guk [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/2364/Huk_Deiaki%20pytannia%20nediisnosti%20pravochyniv%20.pdf;jsessionid=4802655B88A3B0DF989ABE7C6F053029?sequence=3

Gospodars’kyj kodeks Ukrai’ny vid 16 sichnja 2003 r. № 436-IV // Vidomosti Verhovnoi’ Rady Ukrai’ny. – 2003. – № 18. – St. 144 [zi zmin. ta dopov.].

Cyvil’nyj kodeks Ukrai’ny vid 16 sichnja 2003 r. № 435-IV // Vidomosti Verhovnoi’ Rady Ukrai’ny. – 2003. – № 40. – St. 356 [zi zmin. ta dopov.].

Davydova I. V. Nedijsnist’ gospodars’kogo dogovoru za zakonodavstvom Ukrai’ny / I. V. Davydova // Porivnjal’no-analitychne pravo. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 107-110.

Pro dejaki pytannja vyznannja pravochyniv (gospodars’kyh dogovoriv) nedijsnymy: postanova Plenumu VGSU vid 29 travnja 2013 r. № 11 [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0011600-13

Smola S. V. Vyznannja nedijsnym prypy-nenogo pravochynu: analiz praktyky vyshhyh sudiv / S. V. Smola [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: http://lg.arbitr.gov.ua/sud5014/4673456/279659/

Podoljak S. A. Neukladenist’ gospodars’kyh dogovoriv – pogljad zblyz’ka / S. A. Podoljak // Chasopys Kyi’vs’kogo universytetu prava. – 2009. – № 2. – S. 151-154.

Pryluc’kyj R. B. Shhodo problemy vyznannja gospodars’kyh dogovoriv nedijsnymy / R.B. Pryluc’kyj, A. A. Zernychenko // Jurydychna nauka. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 51.

Published

2017-06-30

How to Cite

Беззубов, Д. О., & Армаш, Н. О. (2017). On the issue of the unification of the application of substantive law on recognition of contracts null and void. Scientific Works of National Aviation University. Series: Law Journal "Air and Space Law", 2(43), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.43.11804

Issue

Section

Commercial Law