Robust gain-scheduled control for unmanned aerial vehicles

Authors

  • О. I. Nadsadna Antonov Company

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.48.11207

Keywords:

Gain scheduling, linear matrix inequalities, robustness, unmanned aerial vehicle

Abstract

The flight dynamics of a modern aircraft are highly nonlinear and vary over the wide flightenvelope of the aircraft. This fact makes it difficult for a single controller to achieve the desired closedloopspecifications. This paper considers gain-scheduling successive loop control design for linear parameter-varying system in terms of linear matrix inequalities. The obtained controller guarantees an efficientunmanned aerial vehicle’s control under external disturbances within the flight envelope. The designprocedure is illustrated by a case study of unmanned aerial vehicle lateral channel control

Author Biography

О. I. Nadsadna, Antonov Company

Engineer-researcher.Postgraduate student. Aircraft Control Systems Department National Aviation University

References

R. Austin, Unmanned Aircraft Systems: UAVS Design, Development and Deployment, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2010, 332 p.

R. W. Beard, and T. W. McLain, Small Unmanned Aircraft. Theory and Practice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012, 300 p.

O. P. Basanets, A. A. Tunik, and M. M. Komnatska, “LMI-based static output feedback design for rotating solid body”, presented at I-st Intern.Conf. Methods and Systems of Navigation and Motion Control, Kyiv, 2010, pp. 88–90.

S. Boyd, L. El. Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan, Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory, Philadelphia: PA SIAM, 1994, 205 p.

J. Gadewadikar, F. Lewis, and M. Abu-Khalaf, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for H-infinity static output feedback control,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, vol. 29, pp. 915–921, 2006.

J. Gadewadikar, and F. Lewis, “Aircraft flight controller tracking design using H-infinity static output-feedback,” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 429–440, 2006.

M. M. Komnatska, “Flight control system design VIA LMI-approach,” Electronics and Control Systems, no. 3(37), pp. 49–52, 2013

D. McLean, Automatic Flight Control Systems, Prentice Hall, NY, 1990, 593 p.

J. A. Curry, J. Maslanik, G. Holland, and J. Pinto, Application of Aerosonde in the Arctic “American Meteorological Society”, pp. 1855–1861, 2004.

V. L. Syrmos, C. Abdallah, and P. Dorato,“Static output feedback: a survey.” In Proc. of 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,Orlando, FL, 1997, pp. 837–842.

X.Chen, J. Song and G. Cai, “Robust gain-scheduled autopilot design with LPV reference model for portable missile”, presented at IEEE Aerospace Conference, Montana, 2012, pр. 1–10.

J. W. Rugh and S. J. Shamma, “Research on gain scheduling”, Automatica, vol. 36, pp. 1401–1425, 2000.

R. W. Beard and T. W. Randal, Small Unmanned Aircraft : Theory and Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 317 p.

V. Saeed Vaseghi, Advanced Digital Signal Processing and Noise Reduction, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons. 2000, pp. 297–330.

M. O. Rauw, A Simulink Toolbox for Flight Dynamics and Control Analysis, oct 11, 2000, 263 p.

O. O. Abramovich, and A. A. Tunik, “Multi-Model Approach to Parametric Robust Optimization of Digital Flight Control Systems”, Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Begell House Inc., no. 36(3), pp. 25–34, 2004.

R. W. Beard and T. W. Randal, Small Unmanned Aircraft : Theory and Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 317 p.

Arnar Hjartarson, Peter Seiler, and Gary J. Balas “LPV analysis of a gain scheduled control for an aeroelastic aircraft”, presented at 2014 American Control Conference, Portland, OR, 2014, pp. 3778–3783

A. A. Tunik and M. M. Komnatska, “On structures of combined uav flight control systems with elements of fuzzy logics”, Electronics and Control Systems , no. 3(41), pp. 20–28, 2014.

Downloads

Issue

Section

AUTOMATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS