EVALUATION OF THE INTEGRATED MULTICRITERIAL AIRCRAFT LOAD OPTIMIZATION MODEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2306-1472.85.15137Keywords:
aircraft load optimization model, aircraft loading time, multicriterial optimization, statistic criteria, T – Wilcoxon criterionAbstract
Purpose: presenting of results evaluation after implementation of the new developed load optimization model and model adequacy analysis in order to prove the efficiency by reducing of the main loading time criteria. Methods: experiment, heuristics, statistics, imitation modeling. Results: the developed load optimization model passed all verification procedures and the experimental data analysis enhanced its relevance in an aircraft load optimization process. Discussion: Some parametric statistical adequacy criteria were analyzed to point, that the aircraft load optimization model cannot be checked with their help. Thus, an optimization model with time criteria can be analyzed for adequacy with non – parametric T- Wilcoxon criteria. The article presents the experimental data research that demonstrates the difference between model parameters and real duration of loading / unloading procedures in real time conditions. The imitation model shows the minimization of an aircraft loading time after model’s implementation. So, the following verification results can be considered as a final part of the integrated multicriterial load optimization model’s effectiveness.
References
Bischoff E.E., Marriott M.D. (1990). A Comparative Evaluation of Heuristics for Container Loading. European Journal of Operational Research, 44, pp. 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90362-F
FOK K. (2004). Optimizing Air Cargo Load Planning and Analysis. International Conference on Computing, Communications and Control Technologies, 6 p.
Garey R. M., Johnson D. S. (1979). Computers and intractability. A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. San Francisco, Publ. Freeman, 338 p.
Hald А. (1956). Matematicheskaya statistika s tehnicheskimi prilozheniyami. [Matematical statistics with technical annexes]. Moskow, Foreign literature, 664 p. (In Russian)
Kamkin А.S. (2018). Vvedeniye v formalniye metody verifikatsiy program: uchebnoye posobiye [Introduction to program formal verification methods]. Moskow, Publ. MAKS press, 272 p. (In Russian)
Kublanov M. (2000). Adekvatnoye matematicheskoye modelirovaniye. Dissertatsiya [Adequate mathematical modeling. Dissertation]. Moskow, MSTU of Civil Aviation Publ., 420 p. (In Russian)
Lurkin V., Schyns M. The airline container loading problem with pickup and delivery. European Journal of Operation Research 244 (3), pp. 955-965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.02.027
Štimac I., Vidovic A., Mihetec T., Drljaca M. Optimization of Airport Capacity Efficiency by Selecting Optimal Aircraft and Airline Business. Sustainability 2020, 12(10), pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12103988
Yang J., Yang J., Zhang D. (2002). What's wrong with Fisher criterion? Pattern Recognition 35(11), pp. 2665-2668. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00071-7
Zvonarev S.V. (2019). Osnovy matematicheskogo modelirovaniya: uchebnoye posobiye [The basics of mathematical modeling] Yekaterinburgh, Publ. Ural university, 112 p. (In Russian)
