Case-based assessment method of determining the vague boundaries of safety domains for the joint motion of vehicles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.49.11243Keywords:
Ensemble of vehicles, joint motion, safety domain, blurred boundaries, activity trajectory, position, case, similarity functionAbstract
The case-based assessment method of determining the vague boundaries of safety domains inuncertainty situations using the rough set approach is considered. The construction of spatialconfigurations are described, method of determining the spatio-temporal similarity function is proposed.The proposed method is not sensitive to imprecise and incomplete observations due to using the roughsets to determine dynamic safety domainsReferences
B. Zak, “The problems of collision avoidance at sea in the formulation of complex motion principles,” Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., vol. 14, pp. 503–514, April 2004.
E. Goodwin, “A statistical study of ship domain,” J. of Navigation, vol. 28, pp. 328–344, March 1975.
Z. Pietrzykovski and Chomski J., “A Navigator Decision Support System in Planning a Safe Trajectory,” in Proc. of the 4th General Assembly Int. Ass. of Maritime Universities IAMU, Alexandria, 2003, pp. 4–10.
J. Zhao, Z. Wu, and F. Wang, “Comments of ship domains,” J. of Navigation, vol. 46, p. 422, July 1993.
Z. Pietrzykowski and J. Uriasz, “The Ship Domain – A Criterion of Navigational Safety Assessment in an Open Sea Area,” J. of Navigation, vol. 62, pp. 93– 108, January 2009.
Y. Liu, C. Yang, and X. Du, “A CBR-based Approach for Ship Collision Avoidance,” in Proc. of the 21st Int. Conf. IEA/AIS-2008, Wroclaw, Poland, Lecture Notes In Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5027, 2008, pp. 687–697.
R. Ros, R. López De Màntaras, C. Sierra, and J.L. Arcos, “A CBR system for autonomous robot navigation,” in Proc. of the 2005 Conf. on Artificial Intelligence Research and Development, vol. 131, 2005, pp. 299–306.
H. Lee and K. Rhee, “Developing Collision Avoidance System by Using Expert System and Search Algorithm,” Int. Shipbuilding Progress, vol. 48, pp. 197–212, March 2001.
M. Likhachev and R.C. Arkin, “Spatio-Temporal Case-Based Reasoning for Behavioral Selection,” in Proc. of Int. Conf. of Robot Applications (ICRA), 2001, pp. 1627–1634.
V. Sherstjuk, “Scenario-Case Coordinated Control of Heterogeneous Ensembles of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles,” in Proc. of 2015 IEEE 3rd Int. Conf. Actual Problems of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Developments, October 2015, pp. 275–279.
K.Z. Haigh and J.R. Shewchuk, “Geometric Similarity Metrics for Case-Based Reasoning,” in Working Notes from the AAAI-94 Workshop on Case- Based Reasoning, Seattle, WA, pp. 182–187, 1994.
H. V. Jagadish, B.-Ch. Ooi, K.-L. Tan, C. Yu, and R. Zhang, “iDistance: An Adaptive B+-Tree Based Indexing Method for Nearest Neighbor Search,” ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 364–397, June 2005.
H. Yoon and C. Shahabi, “Accurate Discovery of Valid Convoys from Moving Object Trajectories,” IEEE Int. Conf. on Data Mining, ICDMW'09, 2009, pp. 636–643.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
