Classification of Sentinel-2 Imagery Using Rayleigh Distribution Modeling

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.84.20199

Keywords:

likelihood functions, maximum likelihood method, Rayleigh distribution, remote sensing, satellite image classification, signal processing of spectral bands of satellite images

Abstract

Nowadays land cover classification from satellite imagery is one of most actual and important problems in remote sensing. Multispectral satellite images such as Sentinel-2 images provide high-resolution imagery in different spectral bands, enabling detailed distinguishing of surface objects. This study presents a method of multispectral satellite image classification based on Rayleigh distribution, maximum likelihood method and likelihood functions. It was considered three land cover classes, such as “Water”, “Vegetation”, and “Buildings”, applying three spectral bands (Red spectral band, Green spectral band and Blue spectral band). Proposed classification procedure includes modeling spectral distributions with the Rayleigh probability distribution. The Rayleigh distribution parameters for each class and each spectral band are estimated from training data via the proposed formula. The ESA SNAP software is applied for image processing. Maximum likelihood method is applied for classification procedure. In remote sensing this method is used to classify pixels in satellite imagery into different classes. This method is based on assigning each pixel to the class, for which has the highest probability of belonging. It was described the methodology, including data preparation using the ESA SNAP software and data analysis in Microsoft Excel. The mathematical formulation of the Rayleigh distribution and the mathematical algorithm of calculation of likelihood functions for each class and for each spectral band have been considered. Results include fitted Rayleigh distribution parameters for each class and for each spectral band, classification maps, calculation of likelihood functions and classification result. The classification result depends on which class the maximum likelihood function corresponds to. An example has been considered where the class “Vegetation” is determined using the maximum likelihood method and Rayleigh distribution. The proposed approach can be applied for land-cover classification, ecological monitoring, agriculture and geological tasks.

Author Biographies

Igor Prokopenko, State University "Kyiv Aviation Institute"

Doctor of Engineering Science

Professor

Department of Telecommunications and Radioelectronic Systems

Faculty of Aeronautics, Electronics and Telecommunications

Sofiia Alpert , State University "Kyiv Aviation Institute"

Candidate of Sciences (Engineering)

Assistant Professor

Department of Aerospace Geodesy and Land Management

Architecture, Construction and Design Faculty

Maksym Alpert , National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

PhD

The Department of Information Systems and Technologies

Faculty of Informatics and Software Engineering

Anastasiia Dmytruk , State University "Kyiv Aviation Institute"

Postgraduate student

Department of Telecommunications and Radioelectronic Systems

Faculty of Aeronautics, Electronics and Telecommunications

References

I. J. Myung, “Tutorial on maximum likelihood Estimation,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47 (1), pp. 90–100, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2496(02)00028-7

D. Lu and Q. Weng, “A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(5), 823–870, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600746456

N. Balakrishnan, “Approximate MLE of the scale parameter of the Rayleigh distribution with censoring,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 38, 355–357, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1109/24.44181

L. Ma, Y. Liu, X. Zhang, Y. Ye, G. Yin, & B. A. Johnson, “Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 152, 166–177, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015

A. F. H. Goetz, G. Vane, J. E. Solomon, & B. N. Rock, “Imaging spectrometry for Earth remote sensing,” Science, 228(4704), 1147–1153, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.228.4704.1147

C. Li, J. Wang, L. Wang, L. Hu, P. Gong, “Comparison of Classification Algorithms and Training Sample Sizes in Urban Land Classification with Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery,” Remote Sensing, 6, 964–983, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6020964

C. Persello and L. Bruzzone, “Active and Semisupervised Learning for the Classification of Remote Sensing Images,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52, 6937–6956, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2014.2305805

B. Janga, G. P. Asamani, Z. Sun, N. C. Cristea, “A Review of Practical AI for Remote Sensing in Earth Sciences,” Remote Sensing, 15, 2023 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15164112

I. Prokopenko, S. Alpert, Y. Petrova, “Applications of Dempster – Shafer evidence theory to data processing in remote sensing,” CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 65–76, 2025.

C. Toth, and G. Jóźków, “Remote sensing platforms and sensors: A survey,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 115, pp. 22–36, May 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.10.004

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND RADIO ENGINEERING