Air Traffic Controller Workload as a Factor in Multi-criteria Arrival Sequencing within the Point Merge System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.85.20436Keywords:
navigation, point merge system, air traffic management, controller workloadAbstract
Gate-release strategy in the Point Merge System is crucial for reliable arrival sequencing and separation assurance in terminal areas. In this study, we examine three aggregation policies for the exit decision from the radius-to-fix arc conjunctive (AND), disjunctive (OR), and majority (MAJORITY) implemented with a non-compensatory safety barrier and S* speed-control variants. The objective is to assess each policy’s ability to regulate headways, maintain time-based separation, limit low-altitude level-offs, manage advisory demand, and mitigate environmental impact under varying weather conditions, and to identify their strengths and weaknesses. As an example, we conduct an experimental evaluation on the published geometry of Dublin (EIDW) RWY 28L, parameterising arrivals with realistic kinematics and stratifying by METAR; performance metrics include headways at arc/gate/final, spacing error relative to S*, a time-based loss-of-separation proxy, level-off time, and coarse terminal-area fuel / CO2. Human factors are incorporated through a Human Workload Index combining expected speed-advisory count, level-off time, short-headway alarms, and weather difficulty markers. Alternatives are ranked using TOPSIS with AHP-like weights over Safety, Efficiency, Human, and Environment. The results show that policy choice is the primary driver of headway regularity, advisory load, and low-altitude behaviour; moreover, treating workload as a first-class criterion can overturn rankings obtained from an efficiency-only view. This evaluation helps practitioners select and gate-release policies to site-specific tolerances within an auditable framework.
References
International Civil Aviation Organization. (n.d.). Annex 11: Air traffic services (15th ed.). ICAO.
International Civil Aviation Organization. (n.d.). Doc 4444: Procedures for Air Navigation Services – Air Traffic Management (PANS-ATM). ICAO.
International Civil Aviation Organization. (n.d.). Doc 9859: Safety management manual (4th ed.). ICAO.
B. Favennec, E. Hoffman, et al., “The point merge arrival flow integration technique,” AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-6921
H. Hardell, E. Otero, T. Polishchuk, & L. Smetanová, “Optimizing air traffic management through point merge procedures: Minimizing delays and environmental impact in arrival operations,” Journal of Air Transport Management, 102706, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102706
K. Dönmez, C. Çetek, & O. Kaya, “Air traffic management in parallel-point merge systems under wind uncertainties,” Journal of Air Transport Management, 102268, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102268
International Civil Aviation Organization. (n.d.). Doc 9931: Continuous descent operations (CDO) manual. ICAO.
S. G. Hart, & L. E. Staveland, “Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research,” In Advances in Psychology, vol. 52, 1988, pp. 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
B. Alaydi, et al., “Mitigating the Negative Effect of Air Traffic Controller Mental Workload on Job Performance,” Safety, 10(1), 20, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety10010020
J. K. Kuchar, & L. C. Yang, “A review of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1109/6979.898217
H. Taherdoost, “Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts,” Encyclopedia, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010006
A. Oren, & O. Şahin, “The flight efficiency analysis on the multi-arrival route point merge system,” The Aeronautical Journal, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2021.105
X. Olive, J. Sun, L. Basora, & E. Spinielli, “Environmental inefficiencies for arrival flights at European airports,” PLOS ONE, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287612
K. Dönmez, C. Çetek, & O. Kaya, “Aircraft sequencing and scheduling in parallel-point merge systems for multiple parallel runways,” Transportation Research Record, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211049410
H. Li, F. Wang, R. Yan, et al., “Rapid mental workload detection of air traffic controllers based on EEG power spectrum features, Sensors, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144577
Q. Shao, Y. Sun, X. Zhang, et al., “Air traffic controller workload detection based on EEG and NASA-TLX,” Sensors, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165301
S. Dožić, “Multi-criteria decision making methods: Application in the aviation industry,” Journal of Air Transport Management, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101683
M. F. Bongo, K. M. S. Alimpangog, J. F. Loar, J. A. Montefalcon, & L. A. Ocampo, “An application of DEMATEL-ANP and PROMETHEE II approach for air traffic controllers’ workload stress problem, Journal of Air Transport Management, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.10.001
J.-P. Brans, & P.-H. Vincke, “Note – A preference ranking organisation method (the PROMETHEE method), Management Science, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647
K. Kiracı, B. Yıldız, & M. Bakir, “Aircraft selection by applying AHP and TOPSIS in interval type-2 fuzzy sets environment,” Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00154-3
International Civil Aviation Organization. (n.d.). Doc 4444: PANS-ATM. ICAO.
T. L. Saaty, “Fundamentals of the analytic network process,” Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0158-y
T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process” International Journal of Services Sciences, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
M. Behzadian, S. K. Otaghsara, M. Yazdani, & J. Ignatius, “A state-of-the-art survey of TOPSIS applications, Expert Systems with Applications, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).