Flight Safety Issues During Aircraft Landing Approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.84.20202

Keywords:

flight safety, instrument reliability, radio altimeter, in-flight failure, landing approach, psychophysiological stress, pilot response, avionics diagnostics, system redundancy

Abstract

This paper examines the psychophysiological stress experienced by flight crews during a standard landing approach, a phase considered one of the most critical in aviation operations. Elevated levels of cognitive and emotional strain can significantly influence pilot performance, including situational awareness, decision-making accuracy, and reaction time. The study emphasizes the pivotal role of timely and precise avionics diagnostics in mitigating risks associated with equipment failure or misinterpretation of instrument data. In this context, a method for calculating the reliability of critical onboard instruments during landing is proposed. The approach integrates both technical reliability factors and operational stressors to provide a comprehensive evaluation framework. The findings aim to support enhanced safety protocols and inform the development of more resilient avionics systems.

Author Biographies

Yurii Hryshchenko, State University "Kyiv Aviation Institute"

Doctor of Science (Engineering)

Associate Professor

Avionics and control systems Department

Faculty of Air Navigation, Electronics and Telecommunications

Maksym Zaliskyi , State University "Kyiv Aviation Institute"

Doctor of Science (Engineering)

Professor

Department of telecommunication and radio electronic systems

Oleksii Chuzha, State University "Kyiv Aviation Institute"

Candidate of Science (Engineering)

Associate Professor

Avionics and control systems Department

Faculty of Air Navigation, Electronics and Telecommunications

Tetiana Solomakha

Assistant Professor

Avionics and control systems Department

Faculty of Air Navigation, Electronics and Telecommunications

Dmytro Ivashchenko , State University "Kyiv Aviation Institute"

Master's degree

Avionics and control systems Department

Faculty of Air Navigation, Electronics and Telecommunications

References

Y. V. Hryshchenko, O. O. Chuzha, and T. S. Solomakha, “Spectral analysis of autocorrelation functions of roll and pitch angles,” Electronics and Control Systems, Kyiv, NAU, No. 2(80), pp. 100–104, 2024. https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.80.18693

J. Zheng, Y. Wang, and Q. Li, “Quantitative reliability assessment of aviation instrumentation using exponential failure models,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Reston, ASCE, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1023–1034, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001356

K. J. Smith, T. C. Endsley, and T. K. Clark, “Predicting Situation Awareness from Physiological Signals,” arXiv preprint, Ithaca, Cornell University, arXiv:2506.07930, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07930

L. Lutnyk, D. Rudi, V. R. Schinazi, P. Kiefer, and M. Raubal, “The effect of flight phase on electrodermal activity and gaze behavior: A simulator study,” Applied Ergonomics, Amsterdam, Elsevier, vol. 109, 103989, 2023.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103989

S. Santos, J. A. Parraca, O. Fernandes, S. Villafaina, V. J. Clemente Suárez, and F. Melo, “The Effect of Expertise during Simulated Flight Emergencies on the Autonomic Response and Operative Performance in Military Pilots,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Basel, MDPI, vol. 19, no. 15, 9141, 2022.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159141

C. Fernández Morales, L. Espejo Antúnez, V. J. Clemente Suárez, et al., “Analysis of heart rate variability during emergency flight simulator missions in fighter pilots,” BMJ Military Health, London, BMJ Publishing Group, vol. 170, no. 4, pp. 296–302, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2022-002242

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

AVIATION TRANSPORT