INDIVIDUAL INDICATORS OF METACOGNITIVE MONITORING OBJECTIVITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2411-264X.6.10180Keywords:
individual indicators, intellectual capability, metacognitive monitoring objectivity, motivation to learn, self-assessmentAbstract
The article provides theoretical analysis of the main approaches related to the problem of studying the role of individual indicators in metacognitive monitoring objectivity in the sphere of training activities. In particular, attention is drawn to such individual indicators that affect the objectivity of metacognitive monitoring in the sphere of training activities as intellectual capability, motivation to learn, self-assessment, sex differences, age, mood and so on. On the basis of the analysis it was found that overconfidence as an indicator of inaccuracies of metacognitive monitoring is especially common among individuals showing low levels of success. A special place in psychological and educational researches also the problem of self-assessment and motivation to learn, which are closely related to indicators of academic success, takesReferences
Карпов А. В. Психология метакогнитивных процессов личности / А.В. Карпов, И.М. Скитяева. – М.: Изд-во «Институт психологии РАН», 2005. – 352 с.
Литвинов А. В. Метакогниция: понятие, структура, связь с интеллектуальными и когнитивными способностями (по материалам зарубежных исследований) / А. В. Литвинов, Т.В. Иволина // Современная зарубежная психология. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 59 – 70.
Савин Е. Ю. Когнитивные и личностные факторы уверенности в знании конкретной предметной области / Е. Ю. Савин, А.Е . Фомин // Известия Тульского государственного университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. – 2011. – Вып. 3. Ч. 1. – С. 396 – 403.
Савин Е. Ю. Обобщенные и предметно-специфичные метакогнитивные навыки в учебной деятельности студентов / Е. Ю. Савин, А. Е. Фомин // Психологические исследования. – 2014. – Т. 7, № 37.
Холодная М. А. Психология интеллекта: парадоксы исследования / М.А. Холодная. – 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. – СПб: Питер, 2002. – 272 с.
Carvalho Filho M. K. de. Confidence judgments in real classroom settings: Monitoring performance in different types of tests / M. K. de Carvalho Filho // International Journal of Psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 44, No. 2. – pp. 93 – 108.
Hacker D. J. Explaining calibration in classroom contexts: The effects of incentives, reflection, and explanatory style / D. J. Hacker, L. Bol, K. Bahbahani // Metacognition and Learning. – 2008. – Vol. 3. – pp. 101–121.
Kleitman S. Self-confidence and metacognitive processes / S. Kleitman, L. Stankov // Learning and Individual Differences. – 2007. – Vol. 17. – pp. 161-173.
Koriat A. The self-consistency model of subjective confidence / A. Koriat // Psychological Review. – 2012. – Vol. 119, No. 1. – pp. 80-113.
Kroll M. D. The illusion of knowing, error detection, and motivational orientations / M.D. Kroll, M.L. Ford // Contemporary Educational Psychology. – 1992. – Vol. 17. – pp. 371-378.
Lin L.-M. Effects of text difficulty and adults’ age on relative calibration of comprehension / L.-M. Lin, K. M. Zabrucky, D. Moore // The American Journal of Psychology. – 2002. – Vol. 115, No. 2. – pp. 187-198.
Miller T. M. Unskilled but aware: Reinterpreting overconfidence in low-performing students / T.M. Miller, L. Geraci // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Online First Publication. – 2011. – pp. 1-5.
Pallier G. The role of individual differences in the accuracy of confidence judgments / G. Pallier, R. Wilkinson, V. Danthiir, S. Kleitman, G. Knezevic, L. Stankov, R.D. Roberts // The Journal of General Psychology. – 2002. – Vol. 129, No. 3. – pp. 257-299.
Pulford B. D. Overconfidence in human judgment / B.D. Pulford // PhD Thesis. – Department of Psychology, University of Leicester, 1996. – 129 p.
Tobias S. Knowing what you know and what you don’t: Further research on metacognitive knowledge monitoring / S. Tobias, H.T. Everson // College Board Research Report. – N.-Y. 2002, 2003. – 25 p.
