COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN OF FIXED WING UAV PATH TRACKING SYSTEM

Authors

  • A. A. Tunik National Aviation University, Kyiv
  • M. O. Lavanova National Aviation University, Kyiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.57.13249

Keywords:

Attitude control, flight path control, -optimization, sensitivity function, complementary sensitivity function, genetic algorithms

Abstract

In this paper problem of smooth fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicle path following is considered, when the reference path is the linear piecewise trajectory having points of discontinuity with abrupt changing of the heading angle. The ultimate goal is suppressing deflections of the state vector components, which are dangerous from the flight safety viewpoint, taking in consideration full mathematical model of the inner attitude control loop. The inner attitude control and outer guidance systems consist of the simplest commonly used elements like PD-controllers, washout filters and phase-lead compensators, which parameters have to be found by robust -optimization based on genetic algorithms. In order to avoid over-parameterization of optimization procedure, we propose to solve this problem using its decomposition by two consecutive stages: finding optimal parameters of inner loop at the first stage, and then finding optimal parameters of outer loop at the second stage. We propose to use low pass filter for reference roll signal conditioning, in order to obtain unmanned aerial vehicle smooth pseudo-Dubins flight path. Simulation of unmanned aerial vehicle flight in calm and moderate turbulent atmosphere proves the efficiency of proposed design method.

Author Biographies

A. A. Tunik, National Aviation University, Kyiv

Aerospace Control Systems Department, Education & Research Institute of Air Navigation, Electronics and Telecommunications

Doctor of Engineering Science. Professor. IEEE Life Senior Member

M. O. Lavanova, National Aviation University, Kyiv

Aerospace Control Systems Department, Education & Research Institute of Air Navigation, Electronics and Telecommunications

Master. Post-graduate student

References

Randal W. Beard and Timothy W. McLain, Small unmanned aircraft: theory and practice. Princeton University Press, 2012.

G. H. Elkaim, F. A. Pradipta Lie, and D. Gebre-Egziabher, Principles of Guidance, Navigation, and Control of UAVs, in “Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles”. Springer Netherlands, 2015, pp. 347–380.

P. Sujit, S. Saripally, and J. B. Sousa, “Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Following,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 34, no.1, February, 2014, pp. 42–59.

S. Park, J. Deyst, and J. P. How, “Performance and Lyapunov Stability of a Nonlinear Path-following Guidance Method,” J. Guidance, Control, Dyn., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1718–1728, 2007.

A. A. Tunik and M. M. Komnatska, “Robust Optimization of the UAV Path Following Guidance Systems,” IEEE 4th International Conference on Methods and Systems of Navigation and Motion Control (MSNMC). October, 18–20, 2016, pp. 25–30.

Prentice Hall International, 1990, 593p.

A. A. Tunik, H. Ryu, and H.-C. Lee, “Parametric Optimization Procedure for Robust Flight Control System Design,” International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences. vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 95–107, November 2001.

E. Schoemig and M. Sznaier, “Mixed H2/H Control of Multimodel Plants,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. no. 3, pp. 525– 31, May–June 1995.

G. M. Hoffman, S. L. Waslander, and C. J. Tomlin, “Quadrotor Helicopter Trajectory Tracking Control,” Proc. of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conf. and Exhibition, 18-21 August 2008, Hawaii, Honolulu, pp.1–14.

S. Skogestad ad I. Postlethwaite, Multivariable Feedback Control. Analysis and Design, John Wiley & Sons, 1997, 559 p.

AEROSIM BLOCKSET. Version 1.2 User’s Guide Unmanned Dynamics, LLC No.8 Fourth St. Hood River, OR 97031 (503) 329-3126 http://www.u-dynamics.com

Downloads

Issue

Section

MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF PROCESSES AND SYSTEMS