Acoustic Emission During Composites Fracture According von Mises Criterion and Changing of its Properties Disperstion

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18372/1990-5548.71.16819

Keywords:

acoustic emission, amplitude of acoustic emission, signal duration, destruction criterion, composite material

Abstract

The results of modeling composite elements process destruction by shear force according to von Mises criterion and acoustic emission signals generated with decrease of composite properties dispersion are considered. It has been determined that decrease of composite properties dispersion leads to increase the rate of fall the curves change in the remaining elements in time and decrease the time of fracture process. It was found that with decrease of composite properties dispersion there is increase of generated acoustic emission signal amplitude and decrease in its duration. It has been determined that the regularities of generated acoustic emission signals maximum amplitude increase and acoustic emission signals duration decrease are well described by power-law functions. Comparison of the obtained data with the data at composite destruction according to the OR criterion is carried out. It has been determined that the patterns of acoustic emission signals maximum amplitudes and durations change are similar. However, when using the OR criterion, the values of acoustic emission signals amplitudes and durations are higher than when using the Mises criterion.

Author Biographies

Sergii Filonenko , National Aviation University, Kyiv

Doctor of Engineering Science. Professor

Aerospace Faculty

Anzhelika Stakhova, National Aviation University, Kyiv

Doctor of Engineering Science. Professor

Aerospace Faculty

References

F. T. Peirce, “Tensile tests for cotton yarns: “the weakest link” the-orems on the strength of long and of composite specimens,” J. Textile Inst., 1926, vol. 17, pp. 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/19447027.1926.10599953

S. D. Zhang and E. J. Ding, “Failure of fiber bundles with local load sharing”, Phys. Rev., B, 1996, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 646–654. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.53.646

F. Kun, S. Zapperi, and H. Herrmann, “Damage in fiber bundle models,” Eur. Phys. J., B, 2000, vol. 17, pp. 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011084

D. L. Turcotte, W. I. Newman, and R. Shcherbakov, “Micro- and macroscopic models of rock fracture,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 152, pp. 718–728, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01884.x

S. Pradhan, A. Hansen, and B. K. Chakrabarti, “Failure processes in elastic fiber bundles,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 2010, vol. 82, no 1, pp. 499–555. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.499

Z. Danku, F. Kun, “Record breaking bursts in a fiber bundle model of creep Rupture”, Frontiers in Physics, 2014, vol. 2, no. 8, 8 p. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2014.00008

A. Header, Y. Boughaleb, I. Achik, and K. Sbiaai, “Failure kinetic and scaling behavior of the composite materials: Fiber Bundle Model with the local load-sharing rule (LLS),” Optical Materials, 2014, vol. 36, pp. 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2013.07.035

A. Capelli, I. Reiweger, P. Lehmann, and J. Schweitzer, “Fiber-bundle model with time-dependent healing mechanisms to simulate progressive failure of snow,” Physical Review, E., vol. 98, no. 023002, 11 p. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.98.023002

F. Raischel, F. Kun, and H. J. Herrmann, “Simple beam model for the shear failure of interfaces,” Phys. Rev. E., vol. .72, no 046126, 11 р. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.046126

F. Raischel, F. Kun, and H. J. Herrmann, “Local load sharing fiber bundles with a lower cutoff of strength disorder,” Phys. Rev. E., vol. 74, no. 035104, 4 p. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.035104

D.Cohen, P. Lehmann, and D. Or, “Fiber bundle model for multiscale modeling of hydromechanical triggering of shallow landslides,” Water Resour. Res, vol. 45, no. W10436, 20 р., 2009. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007889

G.Michlmayr, D. Or, and D. Cohen, “Fiber bundle models for stress release and energy bursts during granular shearing,” Phys. Rev. E., vol. 86, no. 061307, 7 p. 2012b, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.061307

G. Michlmayr, D. Cohen, and D. Or, “Shear-induced force fluctuations and acoustic emissions in granular material,” J. of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 118, pp. 6086–6098, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/2012JB009987

F. Bosnia, N. Pugno, G. Lacidogna, A. Carpinteri, “Mesoscopic modeling of Acoustic Emission through an energetic approach,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 45, pp. 5856–5866, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.06.019

N. Pugno, F. Bosnia, and A. Carpinteri, “Size effects on the strength of nanotube bundles,” Meas. Sci. and Technol, vol. 20, no. 084028, 5 p., 2009. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/20/8/084028

S. Filonenko, V. Kalita, and A. Kosmach, “Destruction of composite material by shear load and formation of acoustic radiation,” Aviation, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 5–13, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3846/16487788.2012.679831

S. Filonenko, and A. Stakhova, “Studying acoustic emission by fitting the destruction models of a composite according to the OR criterion and Mises criterion,” Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, no. 3/9(105), pp. 39–45, 2020. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.204820

S. Filonenko, and V Stadnichenko, “Influence of Loading Speed on Acoustic Emission During Destruction of a Composite by Von Mises Criterion,” American Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, 2020, vol. 4(3), pp. 54–59. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmme.20200403.13

Downloads

Published

2022-06-27

Issue

Section

AUTOMATION AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES