Astronomical School’s Report, 2011, Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 28–33

https://doi.org/10.18372/2411-6602.07.1028
Download PDF
UDC 523.9+523.4

From pulsations of the Sun to the wave nature of the planetary system structurization

Skulsky M.Yu.

Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine

Abstract

Investigation of the planetary distances ordering in the Solar system is initiated by the pulsations of the Sun with a period P0 = 160 minutes, as it was found [1] that kinematics of the planetary system can be determined with “spatial scale” L0 = c P0 = 19.24 a.u. (c – speed of light) basing on the orbits lengths ordering of the inner planets 2πa = L0/n and the outer planets orbits intersections 2a = n L0 (where a – a large half-axis of orbit, n – small numbers). Such regularities weren't proved by any physical mechanism, but being transformed into wave form recording wits the wave λ = L0 = cP0, we have seen that in the basis of structurization of the Solar system could lay a phenomenon similar to the standing wave phenomenon with length λsw = λ/2. Indeed, the expression a = nλ/2 places outer planets at distances from the Sun, that are multiple to a half of wave λ/2 (Saturn – λ/2, Uranium – 2λ/2, Neptune – 3λ/2), and Jupiter – at a quarter of λ/4 of this wave. This is true for main transneptunian bodies, including transneptunian families of comets. The regularity for the inner planets is transformed to the wave form 2πa = mλsw1, where λsw1=(1/12)λsw and the orbits lengths from Mercury to Mars are quantized with such numbers as m = 3, 6, 8, 12. These results are consistent for both groups of planets and can be considered as empirical. But there are evident challenges in their interpretation in the hypotheses of electromagnetic as well as gravitational origin.

Keywords: periods of Sun pulsations; cosmogony; structurization planetary system

References

  1. Kotov V.A. (2009). Izv. Krym. Astrofiz. Observ., 105, 173.
  2. Bode J.E. Anleitung zur Kenntniss des gestirnten Himmels. Leipzig, 1772, P.462.
  3. N’eto M.M. (1976). Zakon Titsiusa–Bode. M.: Mir. 192 p.
  4. Flores-Gutierrez J.D., Garsia-Guerra C. (2011). Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrophys., 47, 173.
  5. Lovis C., Segransan D., Mayor M., et al. (2010). Astron. Astrophys. Man. – N HD10180, 2010. .
  6. Kotov V.A., Kuchmi S. (1985). Izv. Krym. Astrofiz. Observ..
  7. Kozlov V.A. (2009). Astronomical School’s Report, 6(1–2), 163. https://doi.org/10.18372/2411-6602.06.2163
  8. Appourchaux T., Belkacem K., Broomhall A., et al. (2010). Astron. Astrophys. Review., 18, 197.
  9. Sokolov V.V. (1992). Astrophys. Space Sci., 191, 231.
  10. Sokolov V.V., Zharykov (1993). Astrophys. Space Sci., 201, 303. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00627203

Download PDF